I think a while back, around the time of the crude fiasco, someone on Twitter put forth a pretty good argument about why, in specific situations, even some stocks can go negative!
All that needs to be done is make the opportunity cost of holding the stock so high, that people will even be willing to pay to get rid of the stock. In theory, but then who thought crude can go -ve, before it actually happened!
All that needs to be done is make the opportunity cost of holding the stock so high, that people will even be willing to pay to get rid of the stock. In theory, but then who thought crude can go -ve, before it actually happened!
Last edited: