Quote:
Originally Posted by rh6996
I think it was Saint who mixed up the trades here Beethoven!!!! Your query would be more appropriate if addressed to Saint as to why the reversal was taken yesterday as per mini flow rules!!! There was no visually obvious Pivot here, though we got one PL by the close!!! But in haste we reversed as per WRB breakdown!!! I sincerely feel that Saint's decision was sudden!!
Kanchan,we don't trade the visually obvious pivot anymore.........as had said countless number of times,the visually obvious pivot trade is no more what we do.We do take those and others too...........my decision was far from sudden.
Saint, No one refuses to accept the change!!! In all honesty ask people to respond to a simple query : How many were willing to reverse where you did without your pointing it out!!! The rule was very much in place in mini not here. Even Rakesh's or was it Prabhjeet, dont remember!!! responce tells us he has also incorporated this change only the Friday
Quote:
Its wrong even to accept whatever Saint writes as correct blindly!!! Do weigh it in your mind and see whether there is an "if" coming , a query coming!!! Problem is we accept it blindly and change our view accordingly, mould our responce also!!! (Saint no aspersion to your actions or views also not written to criticize you)!!!
Now this is your interpretation.... though I repeat, it is wrong to accept whatever you write blindly....it was fine initially but not any more!!! A debatable point needs to be debated and tested and then accepted, otherwise where is the difference between a thread giving tips and a thread teaching how to fish!!! You may ridicule me for my choise of words but am sorry had never learnt to mince words when I am sure of my views though they may sound wrong to others but what matters is whether I consider them correct!!!
Saint I am sorry to have used the same language that i use with others to have used with you!!! Maybe u deserve better!!! But when you talk of recent change this present trade was not taken as per recent change!!! There is no mention of this anywhere before this trade!!!
I was wrong!
Quote:
The question raised by Inspire is MOST GENUINE and needs proper attention!!! Dont act in haste and accept that okay we shall do this in future too!! Most here have back tested as per Saionts rules, now howmany rechecked the historical data with this amended rule and what was the difference in the out put, the profit!!!
Quote:
Quote:
Or
Then do check a few posts on this trade and even your own responce!!!!!
Well I may have studied through Hindi medium in Rajasthan, I may be weak in English but not weak enough not to understand simple english!!!
Quote:
I might be totally wrong becauseut Saint might have seen that this WRB breakdown is working fine in 60 min.flow also in the past...though I did find that on a number of occasions the WRB got reversed much sooner and trading the Pivot would save us from a false trade!!! But I checked just casually and not throughly!!! I said : "Saints decision was sudden!!" because had Saint thought over it he would have posted the amended rule(s) the previous day when the market was off!!! But he mentioned it at the last minutes of the actual trade!!!
Because there was no amendment.....no changes........Kanchan,think you need a re-look ......You see not and blast those who see,.....my friend,a bit of humility is something that you need........I am prepared to help you see what I see,but your words are too strong,too sarcastic.......if indeed you have that small amount of respect for me in some way,the way you post needs correcting,needs change......your "what" is not the issue,your "how" is!
I have to agree to it Saint, after re reading my post I also realise the HOW of mine was wrong!!! But frankly a few PM's made me do it!!! No use discussing it here!!! But i agree my language needs refinement!!!
Quote:
Ofcourse Saint shall be able to clear this, though no clarification is required!!!! If Saint says it works, it wil work, but let us also do our work of 'rechecking' by past analysis!!!
A rule change is a rule change and Iam no one to argue on it, but then my views are mine and have aired them knowing very well that the same shall antagonise a lot of people here but feel its all a part of learning!!
Many of us have removed the "I" from our trades but most of us are yet to remove "Saint" from our trades!!!
This is again an effort in that direction only!!!!
Not to worry.....Saint will remove himself from all trades done here.
Seems I do not agree to this.... the requirement is not Saint removing himself, the need is for others including me to remove Saint from the Trades which we have very failed!!!
Quote:
For once I think Saint has deviated from the rules!!! (Excuse me Saint for this view)
-Kanchan
Well I differ Saint, but if I post my views it will raise another controversy!!!
Dont know anyone other than me has ever criticised you..... dont know about PM's
Please read my next post in this regards addressed to you and then decide about your actions in this regard!!!
Thanx!!!!
ps:I will no more post in this thread,except on weekends......Then,I am going to post here the trades that should have been over the week......And we can then compare notes.
Please do not penalise others for my indiscreation!!!
__________________
"You cannot change the direction of the wind,but you CAN adjust your sail..."
Originally Posted by rh6996
I think it was Saint who mixed up the trades here Beethoven!!!! Your query would be more appropriate if addressed to Saint as to why the reversal was taken yesterday as per mini flow rules!!! There was no visually obvious Pivot here, though we got one PL by the close!!! But in haste we reversed as per WRB breakdown!!! I sincerely feel that Saint's decision was sudden!!
Kanchan,we don't trade the visually obvious pivot anymore.........as had said countless number of times,the visually obvious pivot trade is no more what we do.We do take those and others too...........my decision was far from sudden.
But getting increasingly fatigued by the old hands that refuse to accept change.
Quote:
Its wrong even to accept whatever Saint writes as correct blindly!!! Do weigh it in your mind and see whether there is an "if" coming , a query coming!!! Problem is we accept it blindly and change our view accordingly, mould our responce also!!! (Saint no aspersion to your actions or views also not written to criticize you)!!!
No,my friend,you don't mean to criticise me........you mean to laugh at others for not criticising me.
Quote:
In all probabilites Saint wud be proved correct but friends how long do we continue to use him as a crutch!!! Saint says do this, we do it and then nod our head in agreement!!!
In all probabilites Saint wud be proved correct but friends how long do we continue to use him as a crutch!!! Saint says do this, we do it and then nod our head in agreement!!!
I had said that I would be helping this thread out in the initial phases through the recent change...........Believe me when I tell you that I am finding it difficult to manage all that I do.I did it only to help the process in the initial phases.
I was wrong!
Quote:
The question raised by Inspire is MOST GENUINE and needs proper attention!!! Dont act in haste and accept that okay we shall do this in future too!! Most here have back tested as per Saionts rules, now howmany rechecked the historical data with this amended rule and what was the difference in the out put, the profit!!!
The trade was off a breakdown from the congestion......not because of some failed WRB breakout pattern.You have it dead wrong there,my friend!!
Originally Posted by prabhjeetrana
IF 10pm up bar is negated on downside we can consider it as reversal, right Saint?
IF 10pm up bar is negated on downside we can consider it as reversal, right Saint?
Makes sense, but we never had that in the 60min flow system....if its a pivot then im missing to see it clearly....
MJ-
MJ-
Post by Prabhjeetrana:
MJ the above post from Saint makes me believe that now we are trading failed breakouts on 60 min. also. Anyways I am now short at 2843
MJ the above post from Saint makes me believe that now we are trading failed breakouts on 60 min. also. Anyways I am now short at 2843
Quote:
Or
iginally Posted by prabhjeetrana
IF 10pm up bar is negated on downside we can consider it as reversal, right Saint?
Yes Prabhjeet.......a WRB on high volume with no follow through and negated to the downside.That tells us something of a reversal........what we are going on though is a sideways move breakdown.
Saint
__________________
"You cannot change the direction of the wind,but you CAN adjust your sail..."
IF 10pm up bar is negated on downside we can consider it as reversal, right Saint?
Yes Prabhjeet.......a WRB on high volume with no follow through and negated to the downside.That tells us something of a reversal........what we are going on though is a sideways move breakdown.
Saint
__________________
"You cannot change the direction of the wind,but you CAN adjust your sail..."
Well I may have studied through Hindi medium in Rajasthan, I may be weak in English but not weak enough not to understand simple english!!!
Quote:
I might be totally wrong becauseut Saint might have seen that this WRB breakdown is working fine in 60 min.flow also in the past...though I did find that on a number of occasions the WRB got reversed much sooner and trading the Pivot would save us from a false trade!!! But I checked just casually and not throughly!!! I said : "Saints decision was sudden!!" because had Saint thought over it he would have posted the amended rule(s) the previous day when the market was off!!! But he mentioned it at the last minutes of the actual trade!!!
Because there was no amendment.....no changes........Kanchan,think you need a re-look ......You see not and blast those who see,.....my friend,a bit of humility is something that you need........I am prepared to help you see what I see,but your words are too strong,too sarcastic.......if indeed you have that small amount of respect for me in some way,the way you post needs correcting,needs change......your "what" is not the issue,your "how" is!
I have to agree to it Saint, after re reading my post I also realise the HOW of mine was wrong!!! But frankly a few PM's made me do it!!! No use discussing it here!!! But i agree my language needs refinement!!!
Quote:
Ofcourse Saint shall be able to clear this, though no clarification is required!!!! If Saint says it works, it wil work, but let us also do our work of 'rechecking' by past analysis!!!
A rule change is a rule change and Iam no one to argue on it, but then my views are mine and have aired them knowing very well that the same shall antagonise a lot of people here but feel its all a part of learning!!
Many of us have removed the "I" from our trades but most of us are yet to remove "Saint" from our trades!!!
This is again an effort in that direction only!!!!
Not to worry.....Saint will remove himself from all trades done here.
Seems I do not agree to this.... the requirement is not Saint removing himself, the need is for others including me to remove Saint from the Trades which we have very failed!!!
Quote:
For once I think Saint has deviated from the rules!!! (Excuse me Saint for this view)
-Kanchan
Never,my friend,never........I live by my Rules and I die by my rules....They have had to be fine tuned,and tweaked,.......but I stick by them.One has to ask himself.....Did I deviate?Or didn't you understand?
It is sad though.........but the amount that I have been criticised within this thread leaves a bitter feeling in the mouth.
Anyway,no big deal........wanted to make sure that people could stand on their own feet..........seems that it is already achieved and no further involvement from me is required.
Wishing you all the very best!
Saint
Saint
ps:I will no more post in this thread,except on weekends......Then,I am going to post here the trades that should have been over the week......And we can then compare notes.
Please do not penalise others for my indiscreation!!!
__________________
"You cannot change the direction of the wind,but you CAN adjust your sail..."