Just because something is a "common practice", does NOT mean it's good & excusable. Sati, child-marriage, etc were "common practices" once but that doesn't mean they were good or that they could be excused.
The fact is that "minimum contract note" is NOT a very customer-friendly practice, it shows that the broking-house only cares about its brokerage & not about its customers' equity, which is not a very pleasant thing to know as a customer & sooner or later, broking-houses engaging in such unfriendly practices will suffer the wrath of the traders to various degrees.
(It is blatently obvious from many of your posts here that you're an employee of Angel's or at least have some sort of vested interest in Angel, & the fact that Angel has to engage in misrepresentation to gain clients is very pitiful. I was seriously considering Angel but your goodie-goodie posts & pretence has caused me to reconsider )
The fact is that "minimum contract note" is NOT a very customer-friendly practice, it shows that the broking-house only cares about its brokerage & not about its customers' equity, which is not a very pleasant thing to know as a customer & sooner or later, broking-houses engaging in such unfriendly practices will suffer the wrath of the traders to various degrees.
(It is blatently obvious from many of your posts here that you're an employee of Angel's or at least have some sort of vested interest in Angel, & the fact that Angel has to engage in misrepresentation to gain clients is very pitiful. I was seriously considering Angel but your goodie-goodie posts & pretence has caused me to reconsider )