SMART, pls don't consider my previous post as criticism of your system. I agree it's a good method on the whole & the best thing about it is that it can get better (without disrupting the existing framework).
Regards.
Regards.
1.Stocks that have run a lot will rise steeply, gap up and breakdown
2.Stocks that gained a lot in a compressed time frame will mean revert.
3.Many shares fall Immediately after earnings announcement.Poor results will depress stock prices.Many stocks that have run up a lot on expectation of good results will also start falling even after good results.
All the three situations look promising.I trade pure price,volume action nothing else.I will work on these concepts.
I have gone through an old system implementation thread in this forum.They were working from the wrong end.You cannot build a system on an indicator.Indicators are not systems, they are only tools.Logical concept is more important.Successful systems can be built only on logical concepts using appropriate tools.
Another trap is traders try to build a fully automated system where subjective selection is not involved.As a result the most important part is ignored. Instead of selecting the right stock they start trading signals on random stocks and lose money.
I do not have the skill or knowledge to build automated systems.Final selection is subjective in my methods. I also need a role in the play!
Probably you may differ.