Oh dear oh dear, you prove to be unworthy of a person to debate with. You cannot even justify your own points. Either detail the cost buddy, or quit it 
Regarding your hypothesis about chess being more expensive to play with than football in amateur level, I've heard of fully drunken men speak better gibberish (Unless proven contrary)!
About there being better cricket being a 2nd grade sport in Aus, I have countered here in the last paragraph and you've ignored it entirely (I wonder why?):
http://www.traderji.com/157889-post15.html
About not enough Olympians coming up in India, I've mentioned clearly that it can almost solely be attributed to the bottom of the pyramid, coaching in schools.
About preferring football over cricket because of the latter being an expensive sport, the following quote justifies:
Then why not promote chess? It's a very economical game (surely more economical than football) and could earn millions for these African guys if successful! We do not play games for the purpose of making the poor earn money, we play for the sake of entertainment! The former must always succeed the latter, and it usually always does.
You are yet to prove chess is more expensive, O great grand master.
Surprisingly, you have ignored the latter part of this statement also.
You were trying to enforce your crude likes and dislikes onto other people:
Who in the world cares if you, or G.B.Shaw think football is entertainment or hardcore pornography is? It is what the mass think which determines what general entertainment is. I'm mentioning it for the 3rd time, I cannot help if people are in a delusional state with their subjective generalizations.
About quotes on Swami Vivekananda, I am not willing to comment and I shall not continue on this particular section of the argument. You may take it in which ever way you want to.
About your statements being unbaised, that's pretty oxymoronic. The following quote clearly shows your bias against cricket.
You deem to conclude that football is the only game which deserves to be watched and everything else is unworthy by supporting your cranked up ideas with subjective quotations of supposedly famous people. The times now report gives no "statistic" or "numerical" values about the decline in cricket fans and these fans shifting towards football. His statement of
is unreliable because by no means is it objective.
I've mentioned already that enforcing people using your method to play football can be achieved by pushing funds into football, but without the passion, there will be no results.
Oh Puleez, it is essential that you take up English lessons or atleast get your eye checked up. If you go back to post 27, you will find:
Need I say more? Just incase you have forgotten, it was you who typed the quote, not the times of India reporter . Go check for yourself in post 2. Selective amnesia?
Oh my, losing and incompetent points indeed
Regarding your hypothesis about chess being more expensive to play with than football in amateur level, I've heard of fully drunken men speak better gibberish (Unless proven contrary)!
About there being better cricket being a 2nd grade sport in Aus, I have countered here in the last paragraph and you've ignored it entirely (I wonder why?):
http://www.traderji.com/157889-post15.html
About not enough Olympians coming up in India, I've mentioned clearly that it can almost solely be attributed to the bottom of the pyramid, coaching in schools.
About preferring football over cricket because of the latter being an expensive sport, the following quote justifies:
Then why not promote chess? It's a very economical game (surely more economical than football) and could earn millions for these African guys if successful! We do not play games for the purpose of making the poor earn money, we play for the sake of entertainment! The former must always succeed the latter, and it usually always does.
You are yet to prove chess is more expensive, O great grand master.
Surprisingly, you have ignored the latter part of this statement also.
You were trying to enforce your crude likes and dislikes onto other people:
Who in the world cares if you, or G.B.Shaw think football is entertainment or hardcore pornography is? It is what the mass think which determines what general entertainment is. I'm mentioning it for the 3rd time, I cannot help if people are in a delusional state with their subjective generalizations.
About quotes on Swami Vivekananda, I am not willing to comment and I shall not continue on this particular section of the argument. You may take it in which ever way you want to.
About your statements being unbaised, that's pretty oxymoronic. The following quote clearly shows your bias against cricket.
You deem to conclude that football is the only game which deserves to be watched and everything else is unworthy by supporting your cranked up ideas with subjective quotations of supposedly famous people. The times now report gives no "statistic" or "numerical" values about the decline in cricket fans and these fans shifting towards football. His statement of
is unreliable because by no means is it objective.
I've mentioned already that enforcing people using your method to play football can be achieved by pushing funds into football, but without the passion, there will be no results.
Oh Puleez, it is essential that you take up English lessons or atleast get your eye checked up. If you go back to post 27, you will find:
Need I say more? Just incase you have forgotten, it was you who typed the quote, not the times of India reporter . Go check for yourself in post 2. Selective amnesia?
Oh my, losing and incompetent points indeed
Last edited:
