This insight, IMO, will apply mainly to those who aspire to become great (vs. good).
There might be matters on which you strongly hold a view that most others are totally opposed to. My insight is about this very situation:
Why?
Because if one is proven right, then that will be a tremendous confidence booster. For example, Steve Jobs made many such decisions. Even Dhirubhai. Even Rockefeller. Don Bradman too. Recently Elon Musk.
And, if one is proven wrong, then one would be able to identify as area where one is quite "off"--due to perhaps too much subjectivity. Examples: n/a yet.
In betting terms, high-conviction high-opposition areas have a very high Risk:Reward ratio.
There might be matters on which you strongly hold a view that most others are totally opposed to. My insight is about this very situation:
If one aspires to become extra-ordinary, one must always test one's strongly-held views that most others are totally opposed to.
Because if one is proven right, then that will be a tremendous confidence booster. For example, Steve Jobs made many such decisions. Even Dhirubhai. Even Rockefeller. Don Bradman too. Recently Elon Musk.
And, if one is proven wrong, then one would be able to identify as area where one is quite "off"--due to perhaps too much subjectivity. Examples: n/a yet.
In betting terms, high-conviction high-opposition areas have a very high Risk:Reward ratio.