Stop loss orders are not 100 per cent guarantees of trading safety just as seat belts are not 100 per cent guarantees that one will not sustain injury in a road accident. This is hardly an argument against stop-loss orders or seat belts, however. The evidence supporting the use of both stop loss orders and seat belts is overwhelming!
Mr. Gann was adamant that stop-loss orders should be an integral part of a traders reason for taking a trade. He left no doubt about his views on this subject by saying:
Mr. Gann was adamant that stop-loss orders should be an integral part of a traders reason for taking a trade. He left no doubt about his views on this subject by saying:
Rule 2 Use stop loss orders. Always protect a trade when you make it with a stop loss order 3 to 5 points away.
feel that I cannot repeat too many times the value of using stop loss orders because it is the only safety valve to protect the investor and trader. An investor or trader will place a stop loss order and one time out of ten the stop will be caught at the exact top or bottom. After this he always remembers this and says, "If I place a stop loss order, they will just go down and catch it, or just go up and catch it and then the market will go the other way." So he does not use the stop loss order the next time. The trader forgets the nine times out of ten the stop loss order was right and would have prevented big losses by getting him out at a time when the market was going against him.
feel that I cannot repeat too many times the value of using stop loss orders because it is the only safety valve to protect the investor and trader. An investor or trader will place a stop loss order and one time out of ten the stop will be caught at the exact top or bottom. After this he always remembers this and says, "If I place a stop loss order, they will just go down and catch it, or just go up and catch it and then the market will go the other way." So he does not use the stop loss order the next time. The trader forgets the nine times out of ten the stop loss order was right and would have prevented big losses by getting him out at a time when the market was going against him.