Care:
This is a old news article published on 29 July 2013.
Posting it here just for information and have no intention to scare you.
Be alert, be cautious and Please do not let this affect your trading and investing decisions.
Things may not turn ugly now... but may be some time in the future... never know, but when it does we will be the last to know.
Intention is - Its better to be informed.
In case you feel you have been reading too much on this.... Kindly Ignore.
------------------------------------------------------------------
And you thought $16.7trillion was bad... Leading economist says U.S. national debt is actually $86.8TRILLION
By David Martosko In Washington
PUBLISHED: 20:27 GMT, 29 July 2013
The U.S. government's books are in the red by more than $86.8trillion, according to an influential University of California San Diego economist.
That's a number more than five times as large as the figure acknowledged by the U.S. Treasury and used by government agencies to justify their budgets and spending.
Officially, the debt stands at $16.7trillion, including nearly $12million in debt held by the public in the form of Treasury Bonds, wrote James Hamilton in a working paper for the National Bureau of Economic Research.
On the last day of 2012, the national debt clock in New Yrk City showed $16.38 trillion in debt, comign out to more than $138,000 for each U.S. family. Another $300 billion has been added since then, not including the extra $70 TRILLION Hamilton identified
Hamilton's math shows that at the end of 2012, nearly $70.1 trillion (bottom, right) was owed in off-balance-sheet liabilities, in addition to the 'official' federal debts
But that number doesn't include several 'off-balance sheet' obligations including $54.1trillion in missing funding for Medicare and Social Security, along with support for federal housing, loan guarantees, savings deposit insurance and the cost of actions taken by the Federal Reserve.
'The biggest items in this category come from Social Security and Medicare which, if current policy is maintained, will require enormous sacrifices from future taxpayers,' Hamilton wrote.
Future commitments for Social Security - whose misnamed 'trust fund' is actually empty - will cost the government $26.5trillion in today's dollars when beneficiaries start cashing in their benefits. Future Medicare commitments account for another $27.6trillion.
'These numbers are so huge it is hard even to discuss them in a coherent way,' argues Hamilton.
'Although one can quarrel with the specific numbers, there is an undeniable important reality that they reflect -- the U.S. population is aging, and an aging population means fewer people paying in and more people expecting benefits. This reality is unambiguously going to be a key constraint on the sustainability of fiscal policy for the United States.'
Conservative groups are leaping up to point out the apocalyptic nature of the new numbers.
'If we don't do something to get a handle on these unfunded liabilities, the result will be complete economic decay and catastrophe,' Club for Growth Spokesman Barney Keller told MailOnline.
Keller said it's 'important for America to reform entitlements by doing things like converting Medicare into a voucher system or reforming Social Security by offering private accounts for younger workers.'
Continue Reading....
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-US-national-debt-actually-86-8TRILLION.html