Fund Managers
We can find so many similarities between Fund managers for debt & balance fund & head cashiers of a govt. bank both are working on a fixed terminology
and these fund managers used to provide 5% to 10% result with entry load, switching charges, exit load living their life coolly because they have to invest govt. project with sure less getable profit ,means they are providing very less benefit as compare to normal cooperative banks returns over FD'S.
Here head cashiers are much better then fund managers because who used to allocate the money with different sections without loosing a bit.
Those fund managers are working for growth fund those are more astonished because they used to take away the money from public pockets and say that equity investments are depends upon market risk if every thing is being done by the market then what is their role.
Example- I invested 1 lac. Yearly ulip plan in growth fund in jan 2007 now I have submitted 3 lacs from last three years and my current balance is rs 250000/- in place of rs 364000/- by normal bank fds interest return.
I mean to say that fund managers are financially experts they have huge money to invest & they know what time they have to invest? & what time they have to take their money from the markets. So this line is very wrong mutual funds or ulip investments in equities are depending upon market risks. If there is market then it has to up or down. & fund managers are the professional then they have to behave as per that other wise they are just like clerks
So if any investor loses his basic amount in any fund likes growth then surly fund managers are the not getting the market properly.
Fund managers and their ideas look very astonished but reality is very different
We can find so many similarities between Fund managers for debt & balance fund & head cashiers of a govt. bank both are working on a fixed terminology
and these fund managers used to provide 5% to 10% result with entry load, switching charges, exit load living their life coolly because they have to invest govt. project with sure less getable profit ,means they are providing very less benefit as compare to normal cooperative banks returns over FD'S.
Here head cashiers are much better then fund managers because who used to allocate the money with different sections without loosing a bit.
Those fund managers are working for growth fund those are more astonished because they used to take away the money from public pockets and say that equity investments are depends upon market risk if every thing is being done by the market then what is their role.
Example- I invested 1 lac. Yearly ulip plan in growth fund in jan 2007 now I have submitted 3 lacs from last three years and my current balance is rs 250000/- in place of rs 364000/- by normal bank fds interest return.
I mean to say that fund managers are financially experts they have huge money to invest & they know what time they have to invest? & what time they have to take their money from the markets. So this line is very wrong mutual funds or ulip investments in equities are depending upon market risks. If there is market then it has to up or down. & fund managers are the professional then they have to behave as per that other wise they are just like clerks
So if any investor loses his basic amount in any fund likes growth then surly fund managers are the not getting the market properly.
Fund managers and their ideas look very astonished but reality is very different
Last edited: