Amit,
I am surprised with your finding after including the scale-in logic
I am not sure, how much of thought /research/knowledge of market behaviour has gone into deciding the scale-in logic for your system.
To give you some ideas to improve scale-in logic ..............
Dear AW10,
First of all, thank you very much for your detailed post & suggestions. I will certainly revisit my scale-in logic with your inputs.
Few of my findings for your queries are...
1. My initial scale-in logic was very simple. I assumed that I should add more qty to my winning trades & hence decided to start with smaller qty (2 lots). As max value of my trailing stop is 60, I decided that once trade is in my favor (60+ points) ... it will be a winning trade & I should scale-in. I tried various qty methods (200 at first trigger, 100 at each additional trigger). However I've realized that my original trades are so evenly distributed (in profit ranges of 0-60, 60-120, 120-180, 180-240)…. Scale-in actually did not make any difference.
2. I've checked all 50+ trades (in last year since I'm testing this system in live mode without any optimization to my original numbers), I've found out that...
-- I'm not at all missing anything at top (except 60 points trail stop). This was even surprising to me
-- At entry, I'm missing average 30-40 points but I guess that is necessary to avoid whipsaws & determine strong trend before entering into it.
-- My avg. trend size is about 300 points.
-- So per your calculation, I'm in capturing almost 67% of trend.
3. One more parameter, I've tried to find is how much time I'm not in trade. But again with few odd exceptions (3 occasions to be precise), my alternatively trade is triggered in max of 14 bars (i.e. 7 hours of trading max)
4. Why I chose to scale-in at fixed point basis is because any other logic (such as MA convergence & expansion will become a sub-system in primary system). However now I'm working on a possibility where I should scale-out when price is too far of primary MA & again scale-in when nearer to MA. I'll update you once I can test this little proactively.
5. Lastly, I feel that one more improvement (instead of scale-in) that I need to add to this system (but do not know how) is to come out of alternate mode of system. Currently system is giving buy signal after short signal & again buy signal. Over a last year not in one instance this has gone wrong where my SL has triggered and then price has gone upwards. However i can see such possibility & maybe I can introduce small sub-system within the framework of primary system rules.
Once again thank you for your time. Your suggestions are really important to me in developing this system an improved one. Above reasons/findings are only with a view to share info that I've and see where this can be improved.
All viewers of this post: Please feel free to share your views on this discussion. Thank you.