- Joined
- Sep 8, 2015
- Messages
- 1,856
- Likes
- 4,590
@RadhuK
Theoretically, you are right but most of the traders are small traders, trading with multiple lots of options using few thousand capitals. They can't short even one unit of future with that tiny capital.
Most traders have less than 1 lakh capital, mostly trading with around 25,000-50,000 capital only to test the water (loss-making traders).
*********
Also, remember that we have to bear the cost of clearing two contracts even if the overall effect on the physical delivery of it is NULL.
The breakeven of the future is much higher than options.
If it adds with per lot option trading cost than the cost of trading will be big as option premium are pretty small comparing to future value.
Already traders are facing lots of unwanted tax. Why should we pay more? This is the indirect way to increase the volume by robbing the traders.
Theoretically, you are right but most of the traders are small traders, trading with multiple lots of options using few thousand capitals. They can't short even one unit of future with that tiny capital.
Most traders have less than 1 lakh capital, mostly trading with around 25,000-50,000 capital only to test the water (loss-making traders).
*********
Also, remember that we have to bear the cost of clearing two contracts even if the overall effect on the physical delivery of it is NULL.
The breakeven of the future is much higher than options.
If it adds with per lot option trading cost than the cost of trading will be big as option premium are pretty small comparing to future value.
Already traders are facing lots of unwanted tax. Why should we pay more? This is the indirect way to increase the volume by robbing the traders.