- Joined
- Sep 30, 2005
- Messages
- 1,077
- Likes
- 81
It is the obvious that is very often the most difficult thing to deduce. The Markov chain unfolded
--> Now here's a guy who's registered today
--> His first post is in a controversial thread (Why would any new member pick such a thread to introduce? (It must be someone with really deep interest in the subject matter)
--> He introduces himself in the very thread claiming to act as a "neutral" (why? He could really be a neutral or is Mr.Nandy/his marketer himself in a new ID to avoid moderator regulations on advertising)
--> This guy seems to have a degree of mastery over what is written in the entire thread of 8 pages. A casual reader wouldn't bother to go through the details. He must be following this thread right from the beginning.
--> All his posts are directed at people who ask for evidence,, in rather a crude manner (there is obviously only one person who benefits from this)
--> If truly this guy interested is a neutral, he would have asked the "supporters" to mail "the one" and ask for the ledger, not the critics. It is not the inventor who asks proof that his invention doesn't work, it's the critics who ask proof that the invention actually works. Whose duty is it to supply the same?
--> Indiatrader (now who could that be?), who had some 25 out of his 33 odd posts promoting a particular company has disappeared from the thread entirely. A mere coincidence?
Garbage in, garbage out maybe. The end result is obvious. Oh, and you are still welcome to post your ledger Mr.Nandy
--> Now here's a guy who's registered today
--> His first post is in a controversial thread (Why would any new member pick such a thread to introduce? (It must be someone with really deep interest in the subject matter)
--> He introduces himself in the very thread claiming to act as a "neutral" (why? He could really be a neutral or is Mr.Nandy/his marketer himself in a new ID to avoid moderator regulations on advertising)
--> This guy seems to have a degree of mastery over what is written in the entire thread of 8 pages. A casual reader wouldn't bother to go through the details. He must be following this thread right from the beginning.
--> All his posts are directed at people who ask for evidence,, in rather a crude manner (there is obviously only one person who benefits from this)
--> If truly this guy interested is a neutral, he would have asked the "supporters" to mail "the one" and ask for the ledger, not the critics. It is not the inventor who asks proof that his invention doesn't work, it's the critics who ask proof that the invention actually works. Whose duty is it to supply the same?
--> Indiatrader (now who could that be?), who had some 25 out of his 33 odd posts promoting a particular company has disappeared from the thread entirely. A mere coincidence?
Garbage in, garbage out maybe. The end result is obvious. Oh, and you are still welcome to post your ledger Mr.Nandy