Re: MTF timeframe scan output (Scanning Timeframe not Pattern with single timeframe)
Hey Boufalo,
No! I wasn't upset after your post, never!
I posted some of things in your reply that i wanted to say in other post, so my bad.
No, if you are looking for 1 min. to 5 min. and 10 min. to 15 min.. if both condition met, arrow signal .. pc not gonna heat up with this equation .
Yes, i've used tick second database already, it was working fine in pc.. no issue with it .. pc can run foundation afl, which is more than 2000 line of code with plugins .. so it's nothing compared to that.
So, I was intending to say about general problem i was facing.. about timeframerange and not enough example .. and what expandmode one gonna use in it ? in upper problem..
So it wasn't about you! Kindly dont take it on you! I was saying about general problem. ..
that scanning is problem is already done.. we are doing new problem solution .. that timerange solution ..
IF SOMETHING IS NEW, PEOPLE SHOULD ATLEAST GUIDE IT HOW TO DO IT? RATHER THAN THIS IS NOT RIGHT? YOU SHOULD LEARN THIS AND THAT, I'VE NO TIME FOR IT, I'M OUT OF THREAD, WHAT IS THAT? ACTUALLY
this sentence meaning ..... not for you! I was generally saying that WHEN ENOUGH EXAMPLES AND CERTAIN CASES IS NOT PRESENTED, ATLEAST THEY SHOULD HELP ABOUT IT, BECAUSE IT'S BIT DIFFERENT AND NEW.. AND WE ALSO DON'T KNOW WHAT EXPANDMODE WE GONNA USE ? BECAUSE WE USING TWO DIFFERENT TIMERANGE LOOPS AND HOW DO WE GET POINTED IT WITH TIMEFRAMEEXPAND.. WE DON'T KNOW .. SO I SAID ..
SO I WAS NOT ABOUT YOU .. KINDLY DONT MIND IT .
OU SHOULD LEARN THIS AND THAT, I'VE NO TIME FOR IT, I'M OUT OF THREAD, WHAT IS THAT? ACTUALLY THIS SENTENCE MEANING , IT'S BETTER TO POINT OUT MISTAKE THAN SAYING SUCH WORDS.. LIKE YOU KNOW .. AGAIN NOT SAYING TO YOU ! KINDLY TAKE ON YOURSELF.
Why ? because to use MTF on a chart on a tick timeframe as you said you need a lot of cpu power and good aeration for online trading , without scanning every x minute and store your signals in a statickvar.
WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THIS CODE: NOT THAT ONE
BOUFALO,WE'RE TRYING TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM IN THREAD !
I dond know why you really upset after my post.
Is this that you asking me when I said, Why not to use a scan?
Let me put it in different way.
This is my opinion ok…what I believe in the end of the day you are going to heat up your PC and I was thinking just to save you few dollars instead to buy a new one.
With the way that I imagine you end up of you code you are going to kill it.
Why ? because to use MTF on a chart on a tick timeframe as you said you need a lot of cpu power and good aeration for online trading , without scanning every x minute and store your signals in a statickvar.
Is this that you asking me when I said, Why not to use a scan?
Let me put it in different way.
This is my opinion ok…what I believe in the end of the day you are going to heat up your PC and I was thinking just to save you few dollars instead to buy a new one.
With the way that I imagine you end up of you code you are going to kill it.
Why ? because to use MTF on a chart on a tick timeframe as you said you need a lot of cpu power and good aeration for online trading , without scanning every x minute and store your signals in a statickvar.
No! I wasn't upset after your post, never!
I posted some of things in your reply that i wanted to say in other post, so my bad.
No, if you are looking for 1 min. to 5 min. and 10 min. to 15 min.. if both condition met, arrow signal .. pc not gonna heat up with this equation .
Yes, i've used tick second database already, it was working fine in pc.. no issue with it .. pc can run foundation afl, which is more than 2000 line of code with plugins .. so it's nothing compared to that.
So, I was intending to say about general problem i was facing.. about timeframerange and not enough example .. and what expandmode one gonna use in it ? in upper problem..
So it wasn't about you! Kindly dont take it on you! I was saying about general problem. ..
that scanning is problem is already done.. we are doing new problem solution .. that timerange solution ..
IF SOMETHING IS NEW, PEOPLE SHOULD ATLEAST GUIDE IT HOW TO DO IT? RATHER THAN THIS IS NOT RIGHT? YOU SHOULD LEARN THIS AND THAT, I'VE NO TIME FOR IT, I'M OUT OF THREAD, WHAT IS THAT? ACTUALLY
this sentence meaning ..... not for you! I was generally saying that WHEN ENOUGH EXAMPLES AND CERTAIN CASES IS NOT PRESENTED, ATLEAST THEY SHOULD HELP ABOUT IT, BECAUSE IT'S BIT DIFFERENT AND NEW.. AND WE ALSO DON'T KNOW WHAT EXPANDMODE WE GONNA USE ? BECAUSE WE USING TWO DIFFERENT TIMERANGE LOOPS AND HOW DO WE GET POINTED IT WITH TIMEFRAMEEXPAND.. WE DON'T KNOW .. SO I SAID ..
SO I WAS NOT ABOUT YOU .. KINDLY DONT MIND IT .
OU SHOULD LEARN THIS AND THAT, I'VE NO TIME FOR IT, I'M OUT OF THREAD, WHAT IS THAT? ACTUALLY THIS SENTENCE MEANING , IT'S BETTER TO POINT OUT MISTAKE THAN SAYING SUCH WORDS.. LIKE YOU KNOW .. AGAIN NOT SAYING TO YOU ! KINDLY TAKE ON YOURSELF.
Why ? because to use MTF on a chart on a tick timeframe as you said you need a lot of cpu power and good aeration for online trading , without scanning every x minute and store your signals in a statickvar.
WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THIS CODE: NOT THAT ONE
Code:
_SECTION_BEGIN("try");
for(i=1; i<=5; i++) {
TimeframeSet(i * in1Minute);
up15= C > O;
}
TimeframeRestore();
for(i=10; i<=15; i++) {
TimeframeSet(i * (2*in5Minute));
up1015= C > O;
}
TimeframeRestore();
expandmode = expandPoint;
up15= TimeFrameExpand(up15, in1minute, expandmode);
up1015 = TimeFrameExpand(up1015, (2*in5Minute), expandmode);
Plot( C, "Price", colorDefault, styleCandle ); // Just to show on pane
PlotShapes( IIF( up15 AND up1015, shapeUpArrow , shapeNone ), colorAqua );
Last edited: