Re: Modified Strategy to earn 15%-20% a month (Strategy inspired by Linkon7's strateg
The trade as it stands currently. The grey row is the option that I closed , rest all legs are open. Notice the new PE addition as a hedge for the NF leg.
Strike Instrument Date Trade Quantity Buy/Sell price premium received CMP (NF) CMP Closing Value P&L
8600 CE 29/08/2016 Sep sell 75 131 9825 8843 -275 -20625 -10800
8600 PE 29/08/2016 Sep sell 75 110 8250 8843 38.25 2868.75 5381.25
8700 CE 29/08/2016 Sep buy 300 87.5 0 8843 196.6 26250 32730
8600 NF 29/08/2016 Sep buy 75 8610 0 8843 8843 645750 17475
8500 PE 02/08/2016 Sep buy 300 28.5 0 8843 25.5 8550 -900
53711.25
Margin used 125500 M2M 42.80%
Writing of straddle understood. You might have written it when nifty around 8600 levels.
when did you open Nifty futures trade? I mean what was Nifty level when you opened Nifty futures trade.
Did you hedge Nifty futures trade with PE immediately at prevailing levels.
Again for 75 qty of Nifty futures your hedge of PE is of 300 qty. The gain in Nifty futures is offset by loss in PE because of delta netral. Then where is the protection for threating side of straddle.
Secondly what is the need of opening new CE trade, when the threatening side is protected by Nifty futures trade? Or is it a directional bet not being a part of protecting the threatened side. My idea here is....had the Nifty reversed, Nifty futures is somewhat protected by PE bought. But the 300 qty CE buy seems unprotected unless you lean on natural protection given by CEs ie maximum premium loss.
My argument is that.... you could have opted for one of them.
1. One lot Nifty futures with 2 lots PE hedge instead of 4 lots.
2. 2 lots CE buy instead of 4 lots CE buy.
Now the market moved in favour of heavy quantity but had the market moved to down, this heavy qty trades could have resulted in overall loss though original straddle is proved right.
Please explain your way of taking the trade.