Re: Accounting Entries and Taxation for Stocks & F&O-A thread for settling these issu
DERIVATIVES INCOME - UNDER WHICH HEAD TO BE TAXED?
Section 2(aa) of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 defines derivatives in an inclusive manner as under:
"derivative" includes
A. a security derived from a debt instrument, share, loan whether secured or unsecured, risk instrument or contract for differences or any other form of security;
B. a contract which derives its value from the prices, or index or prices, of underlying securities.
Today, futures and options based on individual stocks or based on stock indices are the major derivatives traded on the exchanges. The focus of this article is therefore restricted to these futures and options.
Futures:
The ICAI Guidance Note on Accounting for Equity Index and Equity Stock Futures and Options describes futures as:
A futures contract, like a forward contract, is an agreement between two parties to buy or sell an asset at a certain time in future for an agreed price. Futures contracts are normally traded on an exchange. To make trading possible, the exchange specifies certain standardised features of the contract. The exchange may also provide for guarantee mechanism to ensure that each party to the contract meets its obligations and, consequently, risk from default by parties is minimised.
The difference between futures and options is also highlighted by the Guidance Note. Futures and options are both standardised derivative instruments traded on a stock exchange. The difference between these two types of derivative instruments is in respect of the rights and obligations of the parties involved in such contracts. In case of a futures contract, both the parties are under obligation to complete the contract on the specified date. However, in case of options contract, the buyer/holder has a right, but no obligation to exercise the Option, whereas the seller/writer has an obligation but no right to complete the contract.
Like options, futures are also for a maximum maturity of 3 months, expire on the last Thursday of the month and have to be cash settled on maturity. Unlike options, where the premium fluctuates for a particular strike price, the price of the futures itself fluctuates for a particular maturity. On maturity, the purchaser of a futures contracts receives (or pays) the difference between the market price of the underlying share/index on the maturity date and the purchase price of the futures, while the seller of a futures contract receives (or pays) the difference between the sale price of the futures and the market price of the underlying share/index on the maturity date.
Taxation of Futures & Options
Till Assessment Year 2005-06, the Income Tax Act, 1961 did not have any special provisions dealing with taxation of derivatives transactions in general, and dealing with futures and options in particular, though derivatives contracts have been traded on Indian stock exchanges since 2000. The Finance Act 2005 has amended the proviso to section 43(5), with effect from Assessment Year 2006-07, to provide that derivatives trading transactions would not be regarded as speculative transactions, subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions.
For the most part, therefore one needs to look at the normal provisions of the Income Tax Act and understand their applicability to derivatives transactions. Various issues do arise for consideration, more so, since there is also no case law on the subject, as futures and options transactions are of recent origin.
To understand the taxation, one also needs to understand the accounting treatment. The ICAI Guidance Note on Accounting for Equity Index and Equity Stock Futures and Options provides guidance as to how such transactions are to be accounted for.
In substance, the Guidance Note provides that the profit or loss on the transactions are to be recognised only on expiry of the future or option or on squaring up of the position (unless there is an intervening balance sheet). Till such time of expiry or squaring up, the initial margin, premium paid and mark-to-market margin is to be accumulated and shown as a current asset. If a balance sheet is prepared during the intervening period before expiry of the future or option, a provision is to be made for the notional loss, if any, as on that date on a mark-to-market basis, but no profit is to be recognised on such basis.
Whether Always Taxable as Business Income:
The most common issue that arises in taxation of derivatives transactions is that of whether derivatives transactions are always to be regarded as business transactions.
It is true that in most cases, derivatives transactions would be regarded as business transactions on account of the following factors:
1. The purpose behind entering into most derivatives transactions is to profit from short-term fluctuations in market prices.
2. The period of any derivatives transaction cannot exceed 3 months, and such transactions are invariably short-term transactions.
3. Often, the sheer volume of trades in derivatives transactions entered into by a person on an ongoing basis indicates that it amounts to a business.
4. Many people who trade in derivatives may be associated with the stock market in some way or the other they may be stock brokers or their employees, or regular day traders. For such people, derivatives trading is an extension of their normal business activities.
However, the issue of whether an activity amounts to a business or not depends upon various factors, and is not decided just because of the existence or absence of any one circumstance. There can be situations where derivatives transactions may not amount to a business. For instance, derivatives transactions may be carried on by an investor to hedge his investment portfolio. In such a case, the mere fact that the investor had to square up his derivatives position every 3 months and take up a fresh position, or pay mark-to-market on a daily basis, would not detract from the fact that the prime purpose of such transactions was to preserve the value of the investment portfolio.
Another common practice in the stock markets is arbitrage between the cash market and the futures market. It is a well known fact that the difference in prices between the futures market and the cash market is primarily dictated by the short-term interest rates, and such difference is normally equivalent to the interest that one would earn on short term lending. Therefore, a person having surplus funds may buy shares in the cash market, while simultaneously selling an equal amount of futures of the same share in the futures market. He would take delivery of the shares bought in the cash market. On maturity of the futures, the shares bought in the cash market would be sold in the cash market. Since the futures would be squared off at the cash market price, the profit on the transaction would normally consist mainly of the difference between the initial purchase price in the cash market and the initial sale price in the futures market, with small adjustments for expenses such as brokerage, securities transaction tax, service tax and the market spread between the buying and selling quotes in the cash market.
Are such arbitrage transactions business transactions, or are they really in the nature of interest seeking transactions? If one looks at the substance of these transactions, they are not motivated by a desire to earn profits, but just to avail of the benefit of the short term interest rates. There just two legs of the transaction the purchase and futures sale, and the expiry of futures and cash sale. The income element in the transactions is determined right at the outset, and does not fluctuate to any material extent, even if there is substantial volatility in the market. Going by the principle of the substance of the transaction, a view is possible, as was being taken in the past in the case of vyaj badla transactions, that such transactions are in the nature of earning of interest, though they take the form of arbitrage transactions.
It may be however noted that other factors, such as frequency of transactions, nature of other business carried on, etc., would also determine whether such transactions are business transactions or not.
Exclusion of Derivatives from definition of Speculative Transaction:
A new clause (d) has been added to the proviso to section 43(5), excluding certain derivatives trading transactions from the definition of speculative transaction. Such exclusion of derivatives transactions is however subject to certain conditions.
These conditions are:
a. the transaction should have been carried out electronically on a screen-based system. This condition does not pose any difficulty, as all derivatives transactions on the National Stock Exchange or the Bombay Stock Exchange (which today are the only stock exchanges in India offering derivatives transactions) are electronic screen-based transactions.
b. The transaction should have been carried out through a stock broker or sub-broker or other intermediary registered under section 12 of the SEBI Act, 1992 in accordance with the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, the SEBI Act, 1992 or the Depositories Act, 1996 and the rules, regulations or bye-laws made or directions issued under those Acts, or by banks or mutual funds. Since all derivatives transactions on NSE or BSE have to be routed through stock brokers, this condition also does not pose any difficulty.
c. The transaction has to be carried out on a recognised stock exchange.
d. The transaction has to be supported by a time-stamped contract note issued by such stock broker, sub-broker or other intermediary. This also poses no difficulty, as all contract notes now issued by NSE or BSE bear the time-stamp.
e. The contract note has to indicate the unique client identity number allotted under SCRA, SEBI Act or Depositories Act and the permanent account number of the client. The purpose of mention of UIN and PAN is to ensure that such transactions of one person are not recorded as the transactions of another. If, through PAN identification on the contract notes, such purpose is served, an assessee should not be denied the benefit for not complying with a requirement that is not otherwise mandatory for him.
Take for instance, a day trader who trades in shares and also trades in derivatives. If he has incurred a loss in his share day trading activities, and earned a profit on his derivatives transactions of an equal amount, only the day trading loss will be regarded as a speculation loss, and the derivatives profit will be taxable as normal business income.
What are the implications of derivatives trading transactions not being classified as speculative transactions?
This would permit losses in derivatives trading to be set off against any other business income, including share trading profits, failing which, such losses can be set off against any other income. This would encourage investors to try their hand at derivatives trading.