|
| Discuss Which indicator comes closest to being the most complete one? at the Technical Analysis within the Traderji.com - Discussion forum for Stocks Commodities & Forex; I met somebody today who stated that Accumulation/Distribution was a really complete indicator since ... |
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Chat Room [1] | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Technical Analysis Discussion of all the principles involved in technical analysis. |
|
Welcome to the Traderji.com - Discussion forum for Stocks Commodities & Forex. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please read the FAQ. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#1
18th October 2004, 09:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Which indicator comes closest to being the most complete one?
I met somebody today who stated that Accumulation/Distribution was a really complete indicator since apart from opening price, it incorporated everything- closing price, high, low and last but not the least volume. He said similarly about some other market strength indicators and was skeptical on RSI, Stochastics etc since they do not incorporate volume and without volume price rises, declines can be deceptive. One can of course plot volume alongside RSI and observe but I found this quite interesting because of the common saying” Volume precedes price”.
If the above(A/D) is not true, which is the indicator likely to prove to be the most useful-majotiy of situations. I know TA is subjective but still Any comments traderji? Last edited by sh50 : 31st January 2005 at 07:44 PM. 
|
|
#2
19th October 2004, 06:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which indicator comes closest to being the most complete one?
Just to add
Market Facilitation Index comes pretty close.It was developed by Bill Williams of trading chaos.Along with the paint bar studies of fake,squat etc they actually make a very good indicator though not a perfect one.A few of the useful one I find.
|
|
#3
19th October 2004, 07:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which indicator comes closest to being the most complete one?
I do not think that any single indicator can come close to being the most complete one. All indicators have their own weakness and strength. Generally a complete trading system compromises of a set of indicators.
As I like to trade trends and in the direction of trends I think the single most robust and important indicator for me is the "moving average"! It helps me to visually identify trends at a single glance.
|
|
#5
12th January 2005, 12:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which indicator comes closest to being the most complete one?
Multiple Moving Average...
|
|
#6
10th October 2007, 11:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which indicator comes closest to being the most complete one?
You have an interesting site and as a novice to this field I am keen to learn more on the various aspects of trading. Presetly I am studing a book "Technical Analysis of Stock trends" by Robert Edwards and John Magee" find it very confusing . Looking for something more simplified and hence easier to follow. Which indicator would you suggest which comes closest??? and what would you give it in terms of % over the rest.
THANKYOU. wincel
|
|
#7
10th October 2007, 03:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which indicator comes closest to being the most complete one?
As far as i see it Acc-Dis has 2 disadvantages
i) It's slowed down by the cumulation ii) As it's based totally on a single (last) bar, it's distorted somewhat by gaps So a modified version would work better. Regards, Kalyan.
|
|
#8
10th October 2007, 03:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which indicator comes closest to being the most complete one?
Edward & Magee's book was the first one i read on TA & i consider myself fortunate for it. I don't see it as just a book on patterns, but rather how price & volume together (patterns are just the 'footprints' of this price-vol play on the charts) can depict demand-supply. It's pure, classical TA based on just price & volumes. To me it's a great work.
Regards, Kalyan.
|
|
#9
13th October 2007, 06:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which indicator comes closest to being the most complete one?
Quote:
Which Time frame?? I mean for short or intraday basis..... Do you use moving average cross-over? Please guide us in detail.....we are begginer. Thanks RON.
|
|
#10
13th October 2007, 06:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which indicator comes closest to being the most complete one?
Quote:
Hello Mr. Moderator . You are perfectly correct. In any kind of market, the crossover of moving averages particularly 14DMA and 45 DMA for day trading is a pucca one. You can confirm this in Nifty futures on Friday 12th Oct 2007 in the later part of the trading day. Absolute identication can be made when you apply this 2 mt bar. hats off to your remark.
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads for: Which indicator comes closest to being the most complete one?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DownLoading Complete Symbol List From ***** Finance Website | vishalsjain | Software | 40 | 27th December 2007 05:17 PM |
| real time complete quotes list | vbinterface | Introductions | 6 | 13th June 2005 10:57 AM |
Indemnity, Disclaimer & Disclosure
Notice:
• By visiting Traderji.com you indicate your acceptance of our Forum
Rules Disclaimer & Disclosure and indemnify Traderji.com, its
associates and related parties of all claims howsoever resulting from
the usage of the forum.
• Disclaimer: Trading or investing in stocks & commodities
is a high risk activity. Any action you choose to take in the markets
is totally your own responsibility. Traderji.com will not be liable for
any, direct or indirect, consequential or incidental damages or loss
arising out of the use of this information.
• Disclosure: The information in this forum is neither an offer
to sell nor solicitation to buy any of the securities mentioned herein.
The writers may or may not be trading in the securities mentioned.
• All names or products mentioned are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.
General Content Disclaimer Notice:
In light of our policy of encouraging candid, open exchanges of views and the rapid distribution of information originating from many sources, Traderji.com cannot determine the accuracy of information that may be uploaded to the forum. Opinions, advice and all other information expressed by participants in discussions are those of the author. You rely on such information at your own risk. You are urged to seek professional advice for specific, individual situations and not rely solely on advice or opinions given in the discussions. Since Traderji.com is an open and free discussion forum, any comments made by members of this forum in their posts reflect their own views and not of the owner or administrator of Traderji.com. Thus the owner/administrator indemnify themselves of all claims whatsoever and will not be liable or responsible for any members comments/views in this forum Traderji.com. If you find any objectionable or offensive posts made by members of this forum which you would like to bring to our notice for removal then please Contact Us.
