![]() |
|
| Discuss market momentum faltering ? at the Stocks & Shares within the Traderji.com - Discussion forum for Stocks Commodities & Forex; Interesting ... and while you compose your next post, try give some thought to other ... |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Stocks & Shares Discuss technical & fundamental views, trading and investing strategies on individual stocks. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting ... and while you compose your next post, try give some thought to other ratios whcih could be analysed in conjunction... notably the Put Call Ratio
After all, mere FnO volume trends could be misleading if, say,the PC ratio is rising sharply rather than falling : there could be varying interpretations AGILENT |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Continuing from my previous post ...
I wasn't being the least bit sarcastic when i mentioned 15/16k. 15-16k was plausible for me even in May (only more so now) This is why :- In May the EPS (of Sensex companies) was around 570 So even a modest (compared to prev yrs) 20% gowth in earnings would take the current yr EPS past 700. Even with the peak PE remaining at 21+ 15k would be well within striking distance by May '07. Also I felt a 10% upward revision of valuations was something the Indian mkts could legitimately, justifiably claim after the stellar performance over 3 yrs (proving it's not a fluke) That would take us past 16k. (As things stand now the EPS would probably be closer to 750). But in May there were 2 big concerns :- 1) Whether the liquidity would continue to remain buoyant Whether the FIIs would continue to pour in money at the same rate Whether mutual funds would be able to continue garnering money from retail investors after the May drubbing. This has obviously proved to be a false alarm. 2) The possible slowdown in the US and it's cascading effect on the Global Economy. This concern remains (there have been some disturbing if not -as yet- ominous signs of late). Even at PE of 23 the mkts are fairly valued if you consider the earnings growth. Even sticking to my modest fig of 20% (let's consider it a 5-6 yrs avg) the PEG (price-earnings-growth You could think of it as the projected PE) comes to 1.15 (23/20). Now the overvalued range for PEG is 1.3-1.5 & beyond So even on the basis of a 20% avg growth rate fig the bull cycle should peak at PE nearer 30. Till then, hail the bulls! Cheers, Kalyan. Last edited by kkseal; 3rd December 2006 at 03:52 PM. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
BTW when u talk about the 'varying interpretations' the PC ratio can have i'm sure you have something in mind. Would be interesting to know what the interpretations might be. So spell it out pal! Let's discuss it more fully. That's what a forum is all about!! Cheers, Kalyan. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
One thing I do know : interpreting PC ratio is v. diifficult, and should be done only in conjunction with other trends See for example this which elaborates on this complex phenomenon http://www.safehaven.com/article-1612.htm Lets both give this a good read and revert. Meantime, if u have stats on the PC ratio in recent months or weeks, let me know . We can dig our knowhow together, with help of course from experts here AGILENT
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Thanks a lot for safehaven .com Jay |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
You are welcome , Jay
The name is Agilent (as in agile + vigilant ) not Aligent (as in alligator) No offence ! AGILENT
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Offtopic though interesting,just see how a mis-spelt word and misplaced words (in a sentence)can attribute different meanings to the same thing.
Just yesterday in the chatroom i saw an example for this,so i took it up here.Regards Amit. |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
oops... Sorry Agilent..
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Can you please explain how this ratio is linked to leverage? Thanks & Regards, --Ashish |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Hi Ashish, I had wanted to ask the same question. I think leverage as he uses it is not to be interpreted literally (as in borrowed funds : own funds) but otherwise. What he probably means is : options magnify gains and losses (compared to cash markets) just as leveraging onself does. Thus FnO volumes as a mutiple of Cash volumes, is a good proxy to leverage. Am I right KKS ? AGILENT |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads for: market momentum faltering ?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Market momentum may not be disturbed: Brokers | Robbie | Initial Public Offers (IPO's) | 0 | 22nd November 2006 09:50 AM |
Indemnity, Disclaimer & Disclosure
Notice:
• By visiting Traderji.com you indicate your acceptance of our Forum
Rules Disclaimer & Disclosure and indemnify Traderji.com, its
associates and related parties of all claims howsoever resulting from
the usage of the forum.
• Disclaimer: Trading or investing in stocks & commodities
is a high risk activity. Any action you choose to take in the markets
is totally your own responsibility. Traderji.com will not be liable for
any, direct or indirect, consequential or incidental damages or loss arising out of the use of this information.
• Disclosure: The information in this forum is neither an offer to sell nor solicitation to buy any of the securities mentioned herein.
The writers may or may not be trading in the securities mentioned.
• All names or products mentioned are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.
General Content Disclaimer Notice:
In light of our policy of encouraging candid, open exchanges of views and the rapid distribution of information originating from many sources, Traderji.com cannot determine the accuracy of information that may be uploaded to the forum. Opinions, advice and all other information expressed by participants in discussions are those of the author. You rely on such information at your own risk. You are urged to seek professional advice for specific, individual situations and not rely solely on advice or opinions given in the discussions. Since Traderji.com is an open and free discussion forum, any comments made by members of this forum in their posts reflect their own views and not of the owner or administrator of Traderji.com. Thus the owner/administrator indemnify themselves of all claims whatsoever and will not be liable or responsible for any members comments/views in this forum Traderji.com. If you find any objectionable or offensive posts made by members of this forum which you would like to bring to our notice for removal then please Contact Us.