Open Challenge to Charting platform(Amibroker,metostock & other)

#1
In this thread i will disscuss counter arguement and struggle of not properly answering, How you get insulted by bunch of knowledge programmers and lot of things ..
First question enticed me ..
When people don't admit that their charting platform can't able to do it, instead arguing it might be possible.

Just see this pic for today, I will discuss every answer people get who asked it, since i've this question in forms, and other place
Anyways ,
Just see this pic for today.
This is diagram of required exploration/scan output. I'm sure that people not gonna let me ask question here and will criticise , few will say garbage , few will just criticise we are not here for solving your problem .. trust me, before you say, if it's diary, put it in that section, I put it in right section for right reason for
before someone start with
http://www.amibroker.com/docs/MTFIndicators.html
StaticVarSet() and StaticVarGet() functions.staticvaradd() function ,
Output is needed in timeframe as i mentioned by arrow, not like 1 min. to 60 min.. having 60 vertical column.



Kindly traderji, let me say.. just sharing my experience. I have to say it ori have to say it through blogs, for those persons who're seeking for same query.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
#3
This is the answer i get from a guy who sent it to amibroker .

Code:
//timerange between 1 min. to 30 min.
for ( i = 1; i <= 30; i++ ) // 1minute to 30minute 
{ 
    TimeFrameSet( i * in1Minute ); 
    Pv = ( ( ( H - L ) > 4 * ( O - C ) ) AND ( ( H - C ) / ( .001 + H - L ) >= 0.75 ) AND ( ( H - O ) / ( .001 + H - L ) >= 0.75 ) ); 
    TimeFrameRestore(); 

    PVex = TimeFrameExpand( PV, i * in1Minute ); 
    AddColumn( PVex, StrFormat( "PV %g-min", i ), 1.0 ); 

} 

Filter = 1;
This shows output like this..
http://i.imgur.com/eXbjMH0.png


and when i start it, I already said no one need 60 vertical column and output needed as pic ..
and this code doesn't work that means it doesn't even show correct value when you scanned .. I again stressing that when i started i told you people not gonna let me ask.
see the pic .. every interval, it make new horizontal box , so say you do 6 hour trading .. if you look for your desired pattern timeframe ..
you have to look for 60 times vertical column and 60*6 = 360 horizontal column .. now you can think about it .
that's the first answer guy got when he asked such stuff..
required output : http://postimg.org/image/y9fne5j6l/
 
Last edited:
#4
In this thread i will disscuss counter arguement and struggle of not properly answering, How you get insulted by bunch of knowledge programmers and lot of things ..
First question enticed me ..
When people don't admit that their charting platform can't able to do it, instead arguing it might be possible.

Just see this pic for today, I will discuss every answer people get who asked it, since i've this question in forms, and other place
Anyways ,
Just see this pic for today.
This is diagram of required exploration/scan output. I'm sure that people not gonna let me ask question here and will criticise , few will say garbage , few will just criticise we are not here for solving your problem .. trust me, before you say, if it's diary, put it in that section, I put it in right section for right reason for
before someone start with
http://www.amibroker.com/docs/MTFIndicators.html
StaticVarSet() and StaticVarGet() functions.staticvaradd() function ,
Output is needed in timeframe as i mentioned by arrow, not like 1 min. to 60 min.. having 60 vertical column.





Kindly traderji, let me say.. just sharing my experience. I have to say it ori have to say it through blogs, for those persons who're seeking for same query.
since in offline mode, when someone logout it's not showing right ..

so http://imgur.com/LWFdxdb
http://postimg.org/image/y9fne5j6l/
Kindly chek
before i further people not gonna miss it .
you can right click on pic that is not shown and click on Open in next tab, it's showing ..
I can't see edit on first post,, so need to quote it.
 
Last edited:
#5
Second time person asked such question again ..
now answer he got
shootingstar = (((H-L)>4*(O-C)) AND ((H-C)/(.001+H-L)>= 0.75) AND ((H-O)/(.001+H-L)>= 0.75));
neardoji = (abs(O-C)<= ((H-L)*0.1));


pattern = WriteIf(shootingstar,"Shooting Star",WriteIf(neardoji ,"Near Doji","N/A"));

for ( i = 1; i <= 30; i++ ) // 1minute to 30minute
{
TimeFrameSet( i * in1Minute );
AddColumn(c,"Ïnterval",1,colorWhite,colorGreen);
AddTextColumn(pattern,"Pattern",1,colorWhite,colorgreen);
TimeFrameRestore();

Filter = 1;
}
it's showing it like


Now you can judge it ... it's not even looks like a solution
Take any pattern , so here they not having same pattern as output but again things are same .. so ..
 
#6
Now , again other person asked this question ,
He get answer like this ..
Code:
pattern = "";
timeFrame = "";

for ( i = 1; i <= 30; i++ ) // 1minute to 30minute
{
    TimeFrameSet( i * in1Minute );
    shootingstar = (((H-L)>4*(O-C)) AND ((H-C)/(.001+H-L)>= 0.75) AND ((H-O)/(.001+H-L)>= 0.75));
    //pattern = WriteIf(shootingstar,"Shooting Star","");
    if(shootingstar) {
        timeFrame = timeFrame + "," + num2str(i);
        Filter = 1;
        pattern = pattern + ",Shooting Star";
    }
    TimeFrameRestore();
}

if(Filter == 1) {
    AddTextColumn( FullName(), "Company Name" );

    AddTextColumn( pattern, "Pattern", 1.3 );
    AddTextColumn(timeFrame, "Time Frames");
    AddColumn( i, "Minutes", 1 ); 
    // AddColumn( WriteVal(i), "Minutes", 1 ); 
    AddColumn( C, "Close", 1.3 );
}
again you can decide.
I am writing for only those folks , who had such queries.. they had horrible time i bet.
Just ready for getting lot of bad words from other folks , lot of i said on my first post ..
Just see it, and decide.
i will post reply he got ..
 
#8
I also do trade multi timeframe, this is new idea for me.
I saw few code like this in other form.
Your stuff maybe institutional level, normal mtf is easily available.
You do need very good programmer who does understand your stuff. I don't think you will find it on forms.
sorry
 

Similar threads