Optimal f

#3
Any opinions on using Optimal f (as described in books by Ralph Vince) to determine postion sizes ?
For most systems optimal f will be between 15 % to 30 %.For a system which has 50 % success rate and reward/risk ratio of 2:1 the optimal f comes to 25 percent of your trading equity to be risked on each trade. With the kind of mkts we are in,this becomes a way too large .

Trading on optimal f requires that one starts with small capital which one can afford to loose. I dont think most of us can bear the huge drawdowns which is a part of trading on optimal f. Larry Williams trades on optimal f and goes to the Church regularly.:)

I think about 10 % of equity as suggested by Larry Williams is a good viamedia between our 1 % conservative and 25 % opt f trading !!!

Trade well !!!!
 
C

CreditViolet

Guest
#4
For most systems optimal f will be between 15 % to 30 %.For a system which has 50 % success rate and reward/risk ratio of 2:1 the optimal f comes to 25 percent of your trading equity to be risked on each trade. With the kind of mkts we are in,this becomes a way too large .

Trading on optimal f requires that one starts with small capital which one can afford to loose. I dont think most of us can bear the huge drawdowns which is a part of trading on optimal f. Larry Williams trades on optimal f and goes to the Church regularly.:)

I think about 10 % of equity as suggested by Larry Williams is a good viamedia between our 1 % conservative and 25 % opt f trading !!!

Trade well !!!!
Optimal f is a concept, its not a practical method to trade. Using optimal f to determine position size is simply asinine. :eek:
 

snake

New Member
#6
My take on optimal f is that it is provides an upper bound to the amount of leverage one should assume.

For instance, the NSE margining requirements for nifty futures often allow leverage of over 8X. However the optimal f of a nifty trading system may indicate that long term returns decline after a leverage of, say 3X. In this case, optimal f provides useful information to the trader to stay at 3X or lower leverage.

Does anyone have practical experience of implementing optimal f for a mechanical nifty trading system ?
 

beginner_av

Well-Known Member
#7
My take on optimal f is that it is provides an upper bound to the amount of leverage one should assume.

For instance, the NSE margining requirements for nifty futures often allow leverage of over 8X. However the optimal f of a nifty trading system may indicate that long term returns decline after a leverage of, say 3X. In this case, optimal f provides useful information to the trader to stay at 3X or lower leverage.

Does anyone have practical experience of implementing optimal f for a mechanical nifty trading system ?
I wont even try unless I am a long term investor with a huge account and have a diverse portfolio in diverse markets and can take a lot of heat.
 
#8
My take on optimal f is that it is provides an upper bound to the amount of leverage one should assume.

For instance, the NSE margining requirements for nifty futures often allow leverage of over 8X. However the optimal f of a nifty trading system may indicate that long term returns decline after a leverage of, say 3X. In this case, optimal f provides useful information to the trader to stay at 3X or lower leverage.

Does anyone have practical experience of implementing optimal f for a mechanical nifty trading system ?
Optimal f as described by Ralph Vince in "Mathematics of Money Management"is a function of success rate and reward/risk ratio of the system.If you trade any competent system on optimal f leverage,in 5 yrs you will be richer than Anil and Mukesh Ambani added togather. That is of course if you survive huge drawdowns that are part of the opt f trading.

Best wishes for a very ambitious project,and yes dont forget to adopt me after 5 years.:)

If you trade 5-7 % of yr equity on every trade you will have more money than you can spend.

Good luck !!!
 

Palm

New Member
#9
Isn't it true that allocating certain percentage of your account and trade full or near optimal f will give you a better than willingly trade your full account but betting a lot less (more conservative) than f*?
 

Similar threads