Some Stories of Share Markets..!!!

jahan

Well-Known Member
#11
Hello,

From Rags To Riches To Death – A Trader’s Story

A tightly knit office of about 30+ guys during the 1998-2002 internet boom/bust.

So, around late 1999, this hot-shot late 20′s stockbroker decides he wants to quit his job and become a day trader. He comes into our office, all full of himself and with a check for $50k to open an account.

He proceeds to attempt to chat up every guy in our office to learn from them how they made money. This isn’t normally a bad thing as we were all friendly and in it together. But this ****bag was so cocky. Whenever some of our most profitable traders would give him advice, he’d scoff and be like “that’s how YOU make money, and thanks, but I’ve got some better ideas”.

About two months in, from the way he was acting you’d think this guy was making money. Every day, at least once a day, he’d have some profitable trade on and he’d strut around the office making sure everyone knew about it. Of course, you never heard about any of the losing trades he was also sitting on. And in reality after two months his 50k account was down to about 30K….

But then he “tamed the beast.”

Fast forward to just a few days after the NASDAQ peak in April 2000. Yahoo ($YHOO) has traded significantly down from its highs, and Mr. ****bag decides that it is DEFINITELY going back to all time highs. So one morning on the first green opening in several days, he loads the boat huge. Leverage was a bit of a non-issue at our firm, so even though he had approx $30K in his account, he put on a position worth about $150K of $YHOO stock.

Well, wouldn’t you know it, $YHOO starts retracing back to its highs, moving 10 points up like it was nothing. DB starts hooting and hollering, cheering his stock position on, making quite a spectacle of himself. $YHOO moves up another 10 points and it starts to become unbearable.

He calls up his wife: “Honey! I’VE TAMED THE BEAST!! I’m killing it in Yahoo!!” he repeated several times. He then calls up his former stockbroker buddies gloating about how quitting his job was the greatest decision of his life and that they should quit and join him. “I’m making a fortune! I’m taking all you p***** out this weekend! I’m getting us a limo and drinks are on me!”

Meanwhile, the rest of us in the office were all looking at each other, rolling our eyes, and secretly plotting to pants this ****bag and throw him out the window. Nobody likes gloaters, and we all especially hated this guy.

At the close, DB was up about 35 points in his $YHOO position, within one good run from all-time highs again. Naturally, he decided to break the cardinal rule of day trading and hold his position over night. He wouldn’t even take some of the profits off the table. He was so sure tomorrow this stock would be making highs again.

Well, the next day, $YHOO did indeed gap up higher, but only slightly. Of course, our friend had a mighty big smile on his face, as he now considered himself the top dog in the office. He was sitting on something like $150,000 of open profits on an account that just 24 hours earlier was worth $30K.

I wish I could tell you this story ended here with our hero taking his profits and picking up his buds in his fancy limo.

Sadly, Yahoo essentially traded straight down, hard, for a seemingly unending streak of days. And two months later this ****bag was separated from his wife who filed for divorce, was penniless, and was dead. He committed suicide.

courtesy:http://bclund.com/2012/08/21/from-rags-to-riches-to-death-a-traders-story/

Regards,
 
#13
One of the best articles I have read till today. It shows how anyone can be wrong in the markets. We as a trader can only talk about probability, nothing more than that.

This article also draws about our attention that how a guy can learn analysis just by using internet without any formal education in financial markets. He was a law student still had a good command over the subject.

This article also proves one thing that its easy to predict about the market but its very difficult to trade. It also shows that its human nature to plunge on the loosing trade with a false hope that market will come into one's direction soon.

Great work Trader Ravi... Keep it up !!

The rise and fall of Andy Zaky

In the late 1990s, an ad agency creative director I'll call Joe Smith to protect his privacy bought several hundred shares of Apple (AAPL) at $60 apiece. Last fall, at age 42, he found himself out of work and increasingly dependent on the value of those shares to make ends meet.

Following the lead of a 33-year-old investment advisor named Andy Zaky who had written that Apple was going to $750 by January and to $1,000 within a year, Smith converted most of his Apple common stock -- more than he should have -- into high-risk Apple call options. When those options expired in the third week of January with Apple trading below $500, they were worth exactly zero. Smith had lost roughly $400,000 and all his Apple shares.

A lot of people lost a lot of money when Apple went into the extended downward slide that just entered its sixth month. And there were plenty of other experts saying all along that the stock was undervalued and ready to bounce. But Smith's story -- and the story of hundreds of other investors who were following Andy Zaky's so-called Apple model portfolio last fall -- hold a special poignancy for me. Not only did these people get some spectacularly bad advice, but they got it from someone whom I helped make famous.

I'd been writing about Zaky since the fall of 2008. I'd covered his earnings predictions, his buy and sell calls, his critiques of competing fund managers. I'd eaten dinner with him, toured him around my Brooklyn neighborhood, introduced him to my wife.

So I feel a personal and professional obligation to find out what went wrong.

First, some background.

Andy Zaky was born in 1979 and raised in Southern California. He graduated from UCLA in 2003 and UCLA Law School in 2008. His bio on Seeking Alpha, where he's published more than 90 articles over the past five years, describes him as having 10 years of investment experience, although he has no formal training in financial management or technical analysis.

He says he learned everything he knows about trading stocks on the Internet, where he developed a knack for anticipating when a stock was over- or undersold based on a variety of technical indicators, including the Chaikin Oscillator and the RSI (relative strength index).

He first came to my attention in September 2008 with an e-mail that began "Please check your facts." I had written iPod nano when I meant iPod shuffle, and thanked him for catching the error. A month later he showed up in the first of my quarterly "Earnings Smackdowns," which pit professional Wall Street analysts against amateur Apple investors. He was tied for top honors that quarter, having forecast Apple's earnings for Q4 2008 to within a penny.

It was the first of what was to be a series of spot-on predictions -- of Apple's quarterly earnings, of its iPhone unit sales, of the high and low points in Apple's wildly variable stock chart. On May 17, 2012, for example, two days before the stock jumped $30 and began its four-month run to over $700, he issued a public call to buy Apple at $533.52 a share -- advice that was rebroadcast by Daring Fireball's John Gruber to tens of thousands of readers. "This is only the fifth time Zaky has issued a buy on Apple," Gruber wrote. "He's four-for-four."

By then, Zaky had become something of a celebrity. At an Apple Investor Summit held at the Los Angeles Convention Center last March -- a gathering that drew such headliners as Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, Steve Jobs biographer Walter Isaacson, CNBC's Jim Goldman, Fox Business' Cody Willard, Asymco's Horace Dediu and Fortune's Adam ("Inside Apple") Lashinsky -- Zaky was mobbed by admirers from the moment he identified himself at the back of the room.

Zaky was working hard that spring. He had taken his free newsletter, Bullish Cross, behind a paywall in June 2011, charging subscribers $49 a month for his daily live market analysis, annotated charts and weekly summaries -- pieces that were sometimes 3,000 or 4,000 words long.

"There's a solid easy 500% gain to be had in Apple with an imbalanced low level of risk involved," he wrote, with typical bravado, at the launch of Bullish Cross Pro. "There is such a low risk profile in this trade, that I'm actually pretty shocked that not a whole lot has actually been written about it."

As Apple's share price climbed and Zaky's fame spread, investors clamored to get in. In June 2012 he opened his newsletter up to a flood of new subscribers, charging the members of this group $200 a month. At its peak, Bullish Cross Pro had 700 subscribers and a lively bulletin board where Zaky would often field more than 500 comments and questions a day.

Meanwhile, he was onto something even bigger. In late 2011 he'd launched Bullish Cross Capital L.P. -- basically an Apple-only hedge fund -- with a handful of subscribers. By the spring of 2012, the fund's investor rolls had grown six fold. In a Form D filed in November 2012, Zaky reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission that Bullish Cross Asset Management (BCRAM) had attracted 28 limited partners with an average investment of $378,000. The minimum investment, which started at $250,000, had grown to $500,000 by March 2012.
The Bull Cross model portfolio is now deeply underwater. Click to enlarge

The Bullish Cross model portfolio is now deeply underwater. Click to enlarge

It was in the hedge fund that the first signs of trouble appeared. An investor who spoke off the record because he is bound by a nondisclosure agreement, describes how the fund missed both of Apple's big 2012 rallies -- in April when it hit $644 and in September when it hit $705. Zaky lost nearly nearly 50% of the fund's capital in one month (March) by buying bearish put spreads just before the stock rose 10%. The fund also managed to get crushed when the stock went down. In May, when the stock fell nearly 100 points, Zaky had bet heavily on bullish calls spreads.

"It iis amazing how poorly positioned the fund was," this investor writes. "He based his trades too much on how Apple traded in the past and completely discounted any black swan scenarios. He didn't follow any of his own previous advice about how to properly position yourself -- not over-allocating on single trades and having proper upside and downside hedging."

Bt the fall of 2012, Zaky was desperate to recoup the fund's losses. He bet what was left of its capital on more call spreads, gambling that the stock would rally at $630 and hit $700 by January.

When Apple fell to $505 in late November, he sent his investors what must have been one of the most painful letters of his life:

"Dear Limited Partner," it begins. "It is with extraordinary regret that I must inform you that during this very dramatic period, the fund has sustained very heavy and largely irreversible losses... At this point, it makes very little sense for anyone to make a redemption given that the fund's liabilities are greater than the fund's capital balance."

Zaky had taken under management more than $10.6 million of other people's money and lost it all.

But those lost millions -- suffered largely by well-to-do investors who knew the risks they were taking -- pale next to the damage done to the 700 subscribers at Bullish Cross Pro. Many of these investors have since fled the site and joined a Google group called bc-subs (for "Bullish Cross subscribers"), where they commiserate about their lost retirement funds, their ruined marriages, their thoughts of suicide. Many lost hundreds of thousands of dollars. Some lost millions.

"A significant number of the people who lost money following Zaky's trades were people who were not sophisticated enough to understand the instruments in which they were investing," says one member who asked not to be identified. "Early on, Zaky had made recommendations about not putting more than a certain percentage of one's capital into following his Apple positions, but most people ignored that."

"I fell in love with this punk kid," recalls a 40-year-old freelancer who converted shares she had purchased at $90 into the call spreads Zaky was recommending. "He was cool. He wasn't bullshitting. He made sense."

But things got out of hand in October, when Zaky became convinced that Apple was set to rally. "At some point he lost it. When he said hold on to our spreads, I was losing $25,000 a day. I froze. I couldn't sleep."

"I can distinctly remember his urging members to deploy 'any spare cash' they had into the $655-$705 call spread," recalls another former Bullish Cross member.

"It all seems a bit, well, a bit crazy in retrospect," says Joe Smith, the ad guy who converted his $60 Apple shares into options that expired worthless. "He had this way of very agressively stating his position. But when the share price really started dipping in October and November, his comments started sounding more emotional and bombastic."

Smith recalls Zaky doing things a professional money manager would never do: Picking a public fight with a prominent Apple bear (Seabreeze Partners' Doug Kass). Urging members to write to Apple Investor Relations. Talking about a meeting with Apple chief designer Jony Ive that never panned out.

Most tellingly, when subscribers started asking whether they shouldn't be buying some downside protection, hedging their bets in case Apple kept falling, he grew increasing angry and defensive. "By the time I got there he wasn't talking about risk management," says Smith. "He was talking about going all in."

When Zaky finally advised his readers to bail out of their call spreads, it was too late.

Although there is plenty of anger in the Google group -- talk of a lawsuit and what might happen if they ran into Zaky in a dark alley -- many members recognize that they share some of the blame for putting more money than they could afford to lose into high-risk investment vehicles. Besides, no one forced them to follow the advice, as one member put it, of some punk on the Internet they'd never met.

Others, however, seem to be mostly interested in finding another investment guru who will promise, as Zaky did, easy gains with low risk.

One complaint often heard in the group is that Zaky never took responsibility for what happened or apologized for the losses that were suffered. But I know Andy well enough to know that he's shattered by the experience. You can hear it in his letter to BCRAM's investors:

"As a first generation Coptic-American, I was raised with very deep seeded (sic) traditional notions of honor and responsibility. For this reason, I will spend every living breath I have to work with an effort to make our partners whole again...

"I am deeply sorry that I failed you. I brought dishonor to myself and my family, and all I can do at this point is work hard to try and make things right."

On Bullish Cross Pro, Zaky has moved away from covering Apple and concentrated on trading the SPY, which tracks the S&P 500 and requires less faith in fundamentals. For the few members that remain, he has recommended several recovery plans, some of which involved investing in January 2014 Apple options that have already lost most of their value.

Zaky declined to be interviewed for this article beyond a brief e-mailed comment:

"The bottom line is we didn't expect Apple to crash 40% of its value inside of a few months and trade at a 10 P/E ratio given its cash flows. We were on the bull side of the Apple case and it didn't work. I wish I could give you more, but then it would just look like a complicated set of excuses. And what's the point."

Zaky did post a 19,000-word "Apple postmortem" on Bullish Cross explaining what, as he sees it, went wrong. One member of the Google group summarized it in a haiku:

Technicals failed
Fundamentals also
No one did better

By Philip Elmer-DeWitt

http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2013/03/04/apple-zaky-bullish-cross/?source=cnn_bin
 
#14
Some of the effective stories. all these would give what is what about the thought so-called easy money. What they say, ultimately is forecasts and analysis works only for the half time and who think that they can turn the markets would be a looser finally, because time and chance were the rulers of markets since long.
 

TraderRavi

low risk profile
#15
Trader turns $1,500 to $1 million in 3 years
By Hibah Yousuf @CNNMoneyInvest

About three years ago, Tim Grittani decided to begin trading stocks with his life savings of $1,500. Today, the 24-year-old's portfolio is worth more than $1 million.
How did he do it? Not by buying and selling stocks of large and well-known companies like Apple (AAPL, Fortune 500) or Ford (F, Fortune 500). Instead, Grittani trades penny stocks -- very small companies that typically have a price below $1.

He's the first to admit that it's a risky strategy. And it's not for everyone.
"I've been trading every single day for almost three years, and it's been a slow, day-to-day process," Grittani said. He spends the entire trading day in front of a computer screen, in order to buy and sell stocks at the right time. He is sometimes in and out of stocks within minutes, and the longest he ever holds shares is a few days.
So why trade penny stocks? Many of these companies are speculative because they are thinly traded, usually over the counter instead of on major exchanges like the New York Stock Exchange. The Securities and Exchange Commission warns that "investors in penny stocks should be prepared for the possibility that they may lose their whole investment."
Plus, penny stocks are notorious for being part of so-called pump-and-dump schemes, in which scammers buy up shares and then promote it as the next hot stock on blogs, message boards, and e-mails. Once the stock price is artificially pumped up by all the talk, the scammers sell their stake, leaving unsuspecting investors with big losses.
Related: 5 most common financial scams
But Grittani has been able to profit because it's such an inefficient market. He knows what to look for and recognizes how to make money out of pump-and-dump scams without doing any pumping or dumping himself.
In fact, the trade that officially pushed the value of his portfolio over $1 million was a short bet against a company that had been the target of a pump-and-dump scheme. When investors short stocks, they borrow shares and sell them with the hope of buying it back later a lower price and pocketing the difference.
Grittani had noticed shares of a company called Nutranomics, which trade over the counter under the symbol NNRX, had shot up due to what he felt was the manipulation of scammers: the stock had tripled in just a month. Last Monday, Grittani detected that the stock was losing momentum, and he felt that at the very least a small pullback was imminent.
Sure enough, the stock tumbled almost 60% in the span of 23 minutes. Though he didn't benefit from the entire plunge, Grittani walked away $8,000 in ten minutes.

Grittani learned about penny stocks from Tim Sykes, who is famous for turning his Bar Mitzvah gift money of about $12,000 into millions by day-trading penny stocks while in college. For the past five years, Sykes his been teaching his strategies through the sale of instructional newsletters and video lessons.
Grittani first learned about Sykes in early 2011, when he was a senior finance major at Marquette University in Milwaukee.
Earlier on in college, Grittani played poker and made wagers on sports games to make money. He had some luck, including a $9,000 win from a sports bet. But he lost all of that over the course of a year and decided he needed to quit gambling. So he took a shot at investing.
"I started by opening an account with $500 to see what I could pick up on my own," said Grittani. "But within a few weeks I lost half my account and decided I needed some outside help."

Grittani scoured the internet and eventually came upon Syke's story. He spent a few months learning about Syke's theories and eventually started trading. The first few months were rough. At one point he was $1,300 in the hole. But within six months, Grittani made his first big winning trade.
After receiving an e-mail about what he felt was a pump-and-dump scheme targeting Amwest Imaging, Grittani plowed $3,000 into the company. Figuring that it would eventually collapse, he sold his stake within 10 minutes. But that was enough to book a 70% gain, or $2,000. (Amwest Imaging has since changed its name to Intertech Solutions, trading under the symbol ITEC.)
"That's the kind of volatility penny stocks have when they are promoted. The key is to buy them ahead of the crowd," said Grittani.

But Grittani and Sykes both go out of their way to point out that trading in penny stocks is not the same as long-term investing. This is not a strategy for your retirement accounts.
"I think it's mainly for people who are gamblers," said Sykes, who taught himself all about trading. "But at casinos you play with low odds. With penny stocks, there are patterns that are very predictable."
Along those lines, Grittani's biggest win over the past few years was a quick trade in Fannie Mae (FNMA, Fortune 500). While there wasn't a particular news catalyst that prompted him to look at the government-sponsored mortgage giant, Grittani spotted increased volume and activity that suggested the stock would tank and then bounce back. Through a combination of long and short trades, he raked in $215,000 in one day.
So what's next for Grittani now that he's hit the $1 million mark? He plans to continue to day trading for at least another two years before taking time off to travel.
And though he's earned a million in trading profits, Grittani says he'd like to eventually get to the point where his personal net worth exceeds $1 million. He currently estimates he's worth $650,000, and anticipates he'll reach his goal "within the next year or two."

Read full story at
http://money.cnn.com/2013/12/16/investing/penny-stock-trader-millionaire/index.html
 

amitrandive

Well-Known Member
#16
The rise and fall of Andy Zaky

In the late 1990s, an ad agency creative director I'll call Joe Smith to protect his privacy bought several hundred shares of Apple (AAPL) at $60 apiece. Last fall, at age 42, he found himself out of work and increasingly dependent on the value of those shares to make ends meet.

Following the lead of a 33-year-old investment advisor named Andy Zaky who had written that Apple was going to $750 by January and to $1,000 within a year, Smith converted most of his Apple common stock -- more than he should have -- into high-risk Apple call options. When those options expired in the third week of January with Apple trading below $500, they were worth exactly zero. Smith had lost roughly $400,000 and all his Apple shares.

A lot of people lost a lot of money when Apple went into the extended downward slide that just entered its sixth month. And there were plenty of other experts saying all along that the stock was undervalued and ready to bounce. But Smith's story -- and the story of hundreds of other investors who were following Andy Zaky's so-called Apple model portfolio last fall -- hold a special poignancy for me. Not only did these people get some spectacularly bad advice, but they got it from someone whom I helped make famous.

I'd been writing about Zaky since the fall of 2008. I'd covered his earnings predictions, his buy and sell calls, his critiques of competing fund managers. I'd eaten dinner with him, toured him around my Brooklyn neighborhood, introduced him to my wife.

So I feel a personal and professional obligation to find out what went wrong.

First, some background.

Andy Zaky was born in 1979 and raised in Southern California. He graduated from UCLA in 2003 and UCLA Law School in 2008. His bio on Seeking Alpha, where he's published more than 90 articles over the past five years, describes him as having 10 years of investment experience, although he has no formal training in financial management or technical analysis.

He says he learned everything he knows about trading stocks on the Internet, where he developed a knack for anticipating when a stock was over- or undersold based on a variety of technical indicators, including the Chaikin Oscillator and the RSI (relative strength index).

He first came to my attention in September 2008 with an e-mail that began "Please check your facts." I had written iPod nano when I meant iPod shuffle, and thanked him for catching the error. A month later he showed up in the first of my quarterly "Earnings Smackdowns," which pit professional Wall Street analysts against amateur Apple investors. He was tied for top honors that quarter, having forecast Apple's earnings for Q4 2008 to within a penny.

It was the first of what was to be a series of spot-on predictions -- of Apple's quarterly earnings, of its iPhone unit sales, of the high and low points in Apple's wildly variable stock chart. On May 17, 2012, for example, two days before the stock jumped $30 and began its four-month run to over $700, he issued a public call to buy Apple at $533.52 a share -- advice that was rebroadcast by Daring Fireball's John Gruber to tens of thousands of readers. "This is only the fifth time Zaky has issued a buy on Apple," Gruber wrote. "He's four-for-four."

By then, Zaky had become something of a celebrity. At an Apple Investor Summit held at the Los Angeles Convention Center last March -- a gathering that drew such headliners as Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, Steve Jobs biographer Walter Isaacson, CNBC's Jim Goldman, Fox Business' Cody Willard, Asymco's Horace Dediu and Fortune's Adam ("Inside Apple") Lashinsky -- Zaky was mobbed by admirers from the moment he identified himself at the back of the room.

Zaky was working hard that spring. He had taken his free newsletter, Bullish Cross, behind a paywall in June 2011, charging subscribers $49 a month for his daily live market analysis, annotated charts and weekly summaries -- pieces that were sometimes 3,000 or 4,000 words long.

"There's a solid easy 500% gain to be had in Apple with an imbalanced low level of risk involved," he wrote, with typical bravado, at the launch of Bullish Cross Pro. "There is such a low risk profile in this trade, that I'm actually pretty shocked that not a whole lot has actually been written about it."

As Apple's share price climbed and Zaky's fame spread, investors clamored to get in. In June 2012 he opened his newsletter up to a flood of new subscribers, charging the members of this group $200 a month. At its peak, Bullish Cross Pro had 700 subscribers and a lively bulletin board where Zaky would often field more than 500 comments and questions a day.

Meanwhile, he was onto something even bigger. In late 2011 he'd launched Bullish Cross Capital L.P. -- basically an Apple-only hedge fund -- with a handful of subscribers. By the spring of 2012, the fund's investor rolls had grown six fold. In a Form D filed in November 2012, Zaky reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission that Bullish Cross Asset Management (BCRAM) had attracted 28 limited partners with an average investment of $378,000. The minimum investment, which started at $250,000, had grown to $500,000 by March 2012.
The Bull Cross model portfolio is now deeply underwater. Click to enlarge

The Bullish Cross model portfolio is now deeply underwater. Click to enlarge

It was in the hedge fund that the first signs of trouble appeared. An investor who spoke off the record because he is bound by a nondisclosure agreement, describes how the fund missed both of Apple's big 2012 rallies -- in April when it hit $644 and in September when it hit $705. Zaky lost nearly nearly 50% of the fund's capital in one month (March) by buying bearish put spreads just before the stock rose 10%. The fund also managed to get crushed when the stock went down. In May, when the stock fell nearly 100 points, Zaky had bet heavily on bullish calls spreads.

"It iis amazing how poorly positioned the fund was," this investor writes. "He based his trades too much on how Apple traded in the past and completely discounted any black swan scenarios. He didn't follow any of his own previous advice about how to properly position yourself -- not over-allocating on single trades and having proper upside and downside hedging."

Bt the fall of 2012, Zaky was desperate to recoup the fund's losses. He bet what was left of its capital on more call spreads, gambling that the stock would rally at $630 and hit $700 by January.

When Apple fell to $505 in late November, he sent his investors what must have been one of the most painful letters of his life:

"Dear Limited Partner," it begins. "It is with extraordinary regret that I must inform you that during this very dramatic period, the fund has sustained very heavy and largely irreversible losses... At this point, it makes very little sense for anyone to make a redemption given that the fund's liabilities are greater than the fund's capital balance."

Zaky had taken under management more than $10.6 million of other people's money and lost it all.

But those lost millions -- suffered largely by well-to-do investors who knew the risks they were taking -- pale next to the damage done to the 700 subscribers at Bullish Cross Pro. Many of these investors have since fled the site and joined a Google group called bc-subs (for "Bullish Cross subscribers"), where they commiserate about their lost retirement funds, their ruined marriages, their thoughts of suicide. Many lost hundreds of thousands of dollars. Some lost millions.

"A significant number of the people who lost money following Zaky's trades were people who were not sophisticated enough to understand the instruments in which they were investing," says one member who asked not to be identified. "Early on, Zaky had made recommendations about not putting more than a certain percentage of one's capital into following his Apple positions, but most people ignored that."

"I fell in love with this punk kid," recalls a 40-year-old freelancer who converted shares she had purchased at $90 into the call spreads Zaky was recommending. "He was cool. He wasn't bullshitting. He made sense."

But things got out of hand in October, when Zaky became convinced that Apple was set to rally. "At some point he lost it. When he said hold on to our spreads, I was losing $25,000 a day. I froze. I couldn't sleep."

"I can distinctly remember his urging members to deploy 'any spare cash' they had into the $655-$705 call spread," recalls another former Bullish Cross member.

"It all seems a bit, well, a bit crazy in retrospect," says Joe Smith, the ad guy who converted his $60 Apple shares into options that expired worthless. "He had this way of very agressively stating his position. But when the share price really started dipping in October and November, his comments started sounding more emotional and bombastic."

Smith recalls Zaky doing things a professional money manager would never do: Picking a public fight with a prominent Apple bear (Seabreeze Partners' Doug Kass). Urging members to write to Apple Investor Relations. Talking about a meeting with Apple chief designer Jony Ive that never panned out.

Most tellingly, when subscribers started asking whether they shouldn't be buying some downside protection, hedging their bets in case Apple kept falling, he grew increasing angry and defensive. "By the time I got there he wasn't talking about risk management," says Smith. "He was talking about going all in."

When Zaky finally advised his readers to bail out of their call spreads, it was too late.

Although there is plenty of anger in the Google group -- talk of a lawsuit and what might happen if they ran into Zaky in a dark alley -- many members recognize that they share some of the blame for putting more money than they could afford to lose into high-risk investment vehicles. Besides, no one forced them to follow the advice, as one member put it, of some punk on the Internet they'd never met.

Others, however, seem to be mostly interested in finding another investment guru who will promise, as Zaky did, easy gains with low risk.

One complaint often heard in the group is that Zaky never took responsibility for what happened or apologized for the losses that were suffered. But I know Andy well enough to know that he's shattered by the experience. You can hear it in his letter to BCRAM's investors:

"As a first generation Coptic-American, I was raised with very deep seeded (sic) traditional notions of honor and responsibility. For this reason, I will spend every living breath I have to work with an effort to make our partners whole again...

"I am deeply sorry that I failed you. I brought dishonor to myself and my family, and all I can do at this point is work hard to try and make things right."

On Bullish Cross Pro, Zaky has moved away from covering Apple and concentrated on trading the SPY, which tracks the S&P 500 and requires less faith in fundamentals. For the few members that remain, he has recommended several recovery plans, some of which involved investing in January 2014 Apple options that have already lost most of their value.

Zaky declined to be interviewed for this article beyond a brief e-mailed comment:

"The bottom line is we didn't expect Apple to crash 40% of its value inside of a few months and trade at a 10 P/E ratio given its cash flows. We were on the bull side of the Apple case and it didn't work. I wish I could give you more, but then it would just look like a complicated set of excuses. And what's the point."

Zaky did post a 19,000-word "Apple postmortem" on Bullish Cross explaining what, as he sees it, went wrong. One member of the Google group summarized it in a haiku:

Technicals failed
Fundamentals also
No one did better

By Philip Elmer-DeWitt

http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2013/03/04/apple-zaky-bullish-cross/?source=cnn_bin
Ravi Bhai

Please keep posting stories like these.They are very knowledgeable and inspiring.At the same time such stories teach us to keep our feet on the ground and not be over leveraged in the markets.

Anything can happen anytime in the market.
 
#17
The rise and fall of Andy Zaky

In the late 1990s, an ad agency creative director I'll call Joe Smith to protect his privacy bought several hundred shares of Apple (AAPL) at $60 apiece. Last fall, at age 42, he found himself out of work and increasingly dependent on the value of those shares to make ends meet.

Following the lead of a 33-year-old investment advisor named Andy Zaky who had written that Apple was going to $750 by January and to $1,000 within a year, Smith converted most of his Apple common stock -- more than he should have -- into high-risk Apple call options. When those options expired in the third week of January with Apple trading below $500, they were worth exactly zero. Smith had lost roughly $400,000 and all his Apple shares.

A lot of people lost a lot of money when Apple went into the extended downward slide that just entered its sixth month. And there were plenty of other experts saying all along that the stock was undervalued and ready to bounce. But Smith's story -- and the story of hundreds of other investors who were following Andy Zaky's so-called Apple model portfolio last fall -- hold a special poignancy for me. Not only did these people get some spectacularly bad advice, but they got it from someone whom I helped make famous.

I'd been writing about Zaky since the fall of 2008. I'd covered his earnings predictions, his buy and sell calls, his critiques of competing fund managers. I'd eaten dinner with him, toured him around my Brooklyn neighborhood, introduced him to my wife.

So I feel a personal and professional obligation to find out what went wrong.

First, some background.

Andy Zaky was born in 1979 and raised in Southern California. He graduated from UCLA in 2003 and UCLA Law School in 2008. His bio on Seeking Alpha, where he's published more than 90 articles over the past five years, describes him as having 10 years of investment experience, although he has no formal training in financial management or technical analysis.

He says he learned everything he knows about trading stocks on the Internet, where he developed a knack for anticipating when a stock was over- or undersold based on a variety of technical indicators, including the Chaikin Oscillator and the RSI (relative strength index).

He first came to my attention in September 2008 with an e-mail that began "Please check your facts." I had written iPod nano when I meant iPod shuffle, and thanked him for catching the error. A month later he showed up in the first of my quarterly "Earnings Smackdowns," which pit professional Wall Street analysts against amateur Apple investors. He was tied for top honors that quarter, having forecast Apple's earnings for Q4 2008 to within a penny.

It was the first of what was to be a series of spot-on predictions -- of Apple's quarterly earnings, of its iPhone unit sales, of the high and low points in Apple's wildly variable stock chart. On May 17, 2012, for example, two days before the stock jumped $30 and began its four-month run to over $700, he issued a public call to buy Apple at $533.52 a share -- advice that was rebroadcast by Daring Fireball's John Gruber to tens of thousands of readers. "This is only the fifth time Zaky has issued a buy on Apple," Gruber wrote. "He's four-for-four."

By then, Zaky had become something of a celebrity. At an Apple Investor Summit held at the Los Angeles Convention Center last March -- a gathering that drew such headliners as Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, Steve Jobs biographer Walter Isaacson, CNBC's Jim Goldman, Fox Business' Cody Willard, Asymco's Horace Dediu and Fortune's Adam ("Inside Apple") Lashinsky -- Zaky was mobbed by admirers from the moment he identified himself at the back of the room.

Zaky was working hard that spring. He had taken his free newsletter, Bullish Cross, behind a paywall in June 2011, charging subscribers $49 a month for his daily live market analysis, annotated charts and weekly summaries -- pieces that were sometimes 3,000 or 4,000 words long.

"There's a solid easy 500% gain to be had in Apple with an imbalanced low level of risk involved," he wrote, with typical bravado, at the launch of Bullish Cross Pro. "There is such a low risk profile in this trade, that I'm actually pretty shocked that not a whole lot has actually been written about it."

As Apple's share price climbed and Zaky's fame spread, investors clamored to get in. In June 2012 he opened his newsletter up to a flood of new subscribers, charging the members of this group $200 a month. At its peak, Bullish Cross Pro had 700 subscribers and a lively bulletin board where Zaky would often field more than 500 comments and questions a day.

Meanwhile, he was onto something even bigger. In late 2011 he'd launched Bullish Cross Capital L.P. -- basically an Apple-only hedge fund -- with a handful of subscribers. By the spring of 2012, the fund's investor rolls had grown six fold. In a Form D filed in November 2012, Zaky reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission that Bullish Cross Asset Management (BCRAM) had attracted 28 limited partners with an average investment of $378,000. The minimum investment, which started at $250,000, had grown to $500,000 by March 2012.
The Bull Cross model portfolio is now deeply underwater. Click to enlarge

The Bullish Cross model portfolio is now deeply underwater. Click to enlarge

It was in the hedge fund that the first signs of trouble appeared. An investor who spoke off the record because he is bound by a nondisclosure agreement, describes how the fund missed both of Apple's big 2012 rallies -- in April when it hit $644 and in September when it hit $705. Zaky lost nearly nearly 50% of the fund's capital in one month (March) by buying bearish put spreads just before the stock rose 10%. The fund also managed to get crushed when the stock went down. In May, when the stock fell nearly 100 points, Zaky had bet heavily on bullish calls spreads.

"It iis amazing how poorly positioned the fund was," this investor writes. "He based his trades too much on how Apple traded in the past and completely discounted any black swan scenarios. He didn't follow any of his own previous advice about how to properly position yourself -- not over-allocating on single trades and having proper upside and downside hedging."

Bt the fall of 2012, Zaky was desperate to recoup the fund's losses. He bet what was left of its capital on more call spreads, gambling that the stock would rally at $630 and hit $700 by January.

When Apple fell to $505 in late November, he sent his investors what must have been one of the most painful letters of his life:

"Dear Limited Partner," it begins. "It is with extraordinary regret that I must inform you that during this very dramatic period, the fund has sustained very heavy and largely irreversible losses... At this point, it makes very little sense for anyone to make a redemption given that the fund's liabilities are greater than the fund's capital balance."

Zaky had taken under management more than $10.6 million of other people's money and lost it all.

But those lost millions -- suffered largely by well-to-do investors who knew the risks they were taking -- pale next to the damage done to the 700 subscribers at Bullish Cross Pro. Many of these investors have since fled the site and joined a Google group called bc-subs (for "Bullish Cross subscribers"), where they commiserate about their lost retirement funds, their ruined marriages, their thoughts of suicide. Many lost hundreds of thousands of dollars. Some lost millions.

"A significant number of the people who lost money following Zaky's trades were people who were not sophisticated enough to understand the instruments in which they were investing," says one member who asked not to be identified. "Early on, Zaky had made recommendations about not putting more than a certain percentage of one's capital into following his Apple positions, but most people ignored that."

"I fell in love with this punk kid," recalls a 40-year-old freelancer who converted shares she had purchased at $90 into the call spreads Zaky was recommending. "He was cool. He wasn't bullshitting. He made sense."

But things got out of hand in October, when Zaky became convinced that Apple was set to rally. "At some point he lost it. When he said hold on to our spreads, I was losing $25,000 a day. I froze. I couldn't sleep."

"I can distinctly remember his urging members to deploy 'any spare cash' they had into the $655-$705 call spread," recalls another former Bullish Cross member.

"It all seems a bit, well, a bit crazy in retrospect," says Joe Smith, the ad guy who converted his $60 Apple shares into options that expired worthless. "He had this way of very agressively stating his position. But when the share price really started dipping in October and November, his comments started sounding more emotional and bombastic."

Smith recalls Zaky doing things a professional money manager would never do: Picking a public fight with a prominent Apple bear (Seabreeze Partners' Doug Kass). Urging members to write to Apple Investor Relations. Talking about a meeting with Apple chief designer Jony Ive that never panned out.

Most tellingly, when subscribers started asking whether they shouldn't be buying some downside protection, hedging their bets in case Apple kept falling, he grew increasing angry and defensive. "By the time I got there he wasn't talking about risk management," says Smith. "He was talking about going all in."

When Zaky finally advised his readers to bail out of their call spreads, it was too late.

Although there is plenty of anger in the Google group -- talk of a lawsuit and what might happen if they ran into Zaky in a dark alley -- many members recognize that they share some of the blame for putting more money than they could afford to lose into high-risk investment vehicles. Besides, no one forced them to follow the advice, as one member put it, of some punk on the Internet they'd never met.

Others, however, seem to be mostly interested in finding another investment guru who will promise, as Zaky did, easy gains with low risk.

One complaint often heard in the group is that Zaky never took responsibility for what happened or apologized for the losses that were suffered. But I know Andy well enough to know that he's shattered by the experience. You can hear it in his letter to BCRAM's investors:

"As a first generation Coptic-American, I was raised with very deep seeded (sic) traditional notions of honor and responsibility. For this reason, I will spend every living breath I have to work with an effort to make our partners whole again...

"I am deeply sorry that I failed you. I brought dishonor to myself and my family, and all I can do at this point is work hard to try and make things right."

On Bullish Cross Pro, Zaky has moved away from covering Apple and concentrated on trading the SPY, which tracks the S&P 500 and requires less faith in fundamentals. For the few members that remain, he has recommended several recovery plans, some of which involved investing in January 2014 Apple options that have already lost most of their value.

Zaky declined to be interviewed for this article beyond a brief e-mailed comment:

"The bottom line is we didn't expect Apple to crash 40% of its value inside of a few months and trade at a 10 P/E ratio given its cash flows. We were on the bull side of the Apple case and it didn't work. I wish I could give you more, but then it would just look like a complicated set of excuses. And what's the point."

Zaky did post a 19,000-word "Apple postmortem" on Bullish Cross explaining what, as he sees it, went wrong. One member of the Google group summarized it in a haiku:

Technicals failed
Fundamentals also
No one did better

By Philip Elmer-DeWitt

http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2013/03/04/apple-zaky-bullish-cross/?source=cnn_bin
Good story to be shared. A lessor to learn - don't put all eggs in one basket.
 

amitrandive

Well-Known Member
#18
Millionaire Success Stories

http://money.howstuffworks.com/personal-finance/budgeting/how-to-million-dollars7.htm

Here are two stories of ordinary people who became millionaires. If it could happen to them, it could happen to you:

Neil McCarthy

Research chemist Neil McCarthy started investing in the stock market when he was 34, in the 1970s. Today he has a net worth of about $2.1 million. When stocks went down, he bought more. He contributed the maximum to both his IRA and his 401(k) and his employer matched 100 percent. That's truly free money -- no risk. The big payoff came during the 1990s bull market when his stock doubled in three or four years, suddenly reaching $1 million.

He avoided technology companies because it didn't make sense to him. He saw price-earnings ratios of 200 to 300 and "thought it was absolute nonsense." This practical investing style saved his millionaire status when the market crashed. When he retired in 2000, McCarthy took his retirement payout as a lump sum. Just before interest rates started to fall, he invested part of the money in an immediate annuity and earned a bigger payout than if he had chosen the company's pension annuity.

His number one piece of advice that made all the difference is this: "If you wait to save out of what's left over from your salary, it's not going to happen. Pay yourself first" [source: Million Dollar Ideas].


Sheri Schmelzer

In 2005, Sheri Schmelzer was a 40-year-old stay-at-home mom when she decided to get creative with her family's multiple pairs of Crocs shoes. The plastic slip-on shoes have ventilation holes across the top and Schmelzer, armed with clay and rhinestones, created mix-and-match designs that would fit in the holes.

Schmelzer came up with the idea just for fun and credits her husband with seeing the sparkly designs' potential. Within weeks, the two had set up a Web site for their new company, Jibbitz, and had started selling the Croc add-ons to the masses, tapping into a home equity loan for capital. Before long, the accessories were sold in stores, too. By August 2006, Jibbitz sales had reached $2.2 million. And, just three months later, the Schmelzers sold their company to Crocs for $10 million, with another $10 million promised if the accessories hit a specified sales goal [source: Anderson]. "If you have good customer service then your customers are going to talk about you," said Schmelzer. "We didn't do any marketing or advertising at all; it was all organic growth" [source: Ladies Who Launch].
 

TraderRavi

low risk profile
#19
Flash crash charges garner increasing skepticism in high-speed world

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The notion that one man trading from his parents' house in a working class London suburb had a material role in the 2010 Wall Street flash crash has aroused increasing skepticism from investors and traders since charges were brought on Tuesday.

The U.S. has asked UK authorities to hand over Navinder Singh Sarao, 36, after his arrest this week on charges that he manipulated markets over several years in a fraudulent scheme that helped cause the stock market rout.

The U.S. Department of Justice alleges that Sarao used souped-up, off-the-shelf software to trick other market participants into thinking massive sell orders were about to hit, causing the so-called E-mini S&P futures prices to drop so he could buy at cheaper levels. In doing so, he made $40 million in profits, U.S. authorities allege.

But traders doubt that Sarao could have had the upper hand in a market dominated by Wall Street firms with powerful computer trading programs and huge technology budgets.

The charges against Sarao, operating far from the center of U.S. markets and engaging in activity some believe occurs every day among larger firms, show that regulators may not shy away from publicity, even if their case may be legally solid.

Linking Sarao to the flash crash "smacks of sensationalism," said Manoj Narang, founder of Tradeworx, a firm that supplies data for regulators. "Maybe they felt that would get the story in the papers. Mission accomplished, I guess."

In Britain, a petition has been started opposing Sarao's extradition to the United States. So far, at least 194 people have signed up to an online message saying "One man with a single broadband connection cannot bring down an entire market."

Sarao, who court documents show pushed around millions of dollars between banks in the Caribbean, Switzerland and the Middle East, has been granted bail in London on conditions including a 5 million-pound ($7.5 million) bond.

His lawyer, Joel Smith, declined to comment on whether Sarao had yet raised the bail and been released, but said he opposes extradition to the United States.



CANCEL IF CLOSE

The view held by some in the market that Sarao is a scapegoat for the flash crash may not help his case much.

The complaint from the Justice Department, and the civil charges from the market regulator, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, stop short of blaming Sarao outright for causing the 2010 turmoil, instead referring to him as a "contributing" factor.

Moreover, the trading activity that the authorities say was illegal occurred on many days over a multi-year period, not just on May 6, 2010, when the flash crash happened.

That means that even without the flash crash, much of the substance of the complaint would still stand, experts said.

The software Sarao allegedly used to execute his trades allowed him to position himself just above or under the market while being certain the bids will never be taken up.

He did this using so-called 'cancel if close' orders, which people in the market said can easily be suspect. It means that as the market price moved close to where Sarao put in his orders, they would automatically be canceled.

Michael Friedman, chief compliance officer at electronic trading firm Trillium in New York, said that market-makers, firms that smooth trading by guaranteeing prices, could legitimately do similar things.

But if people consistently cancel their orders, the case for manipulation can be made, he said.

"So was there a connection between what he did and the flash crash? There certainly isn't an obvious connection if there is one at all," Friedman told Reuters.

Trillium itself was fined in 2010 for similar activity by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Friedman at the time was the firm's outside counsel; he said the firm "paid a fine and got rid of the offending traders."



MOST OF THE MODIFICATIONS

In its complaint, the CFTC focuses on 12 days of Sarao's trading. It shows that on those days, he accounted for more than 60 percent of the order modifications in the E-mini contracts on the CME Group Inc futures exchange.

That was "more than one and a half times that of the rest of the market," the complaint says. But the documents also suggest that Sarao may not have caused volatility himself, but only benefited from wild swings that already existed.

Sarao "isn't a criminal. He is a hero. He is the sort of guy who makes the market safe for ordinary investors," John Hempton of the Australian hedge fund Bronte Capital said on a blog post, saying that Sarao's trading disrupts the trading of high frequency trading firms, which Hempton referred to as "front running computers."

"The Department of Justice has been played into bringing the full force of the U.S. legal system onto an irrelevant trader - just to make the world safer for the real rip-off merchants," Hempton wrote on his blog.

Of the 12 days the CFTC looked at in great detail, Sarao only executed trades on four. A Reuters analysis of those 12 days show those to be more volatile and with higher volume than on average in the April 2010 to August 2011 period, which encompasses all but one of the days the CFTC cited most closely.

For most of the period covered in the complaint, spoofing was not specifically banned.

That is why the authorities charged Sarao with market manipulation, a wider concept, and harder to prove.

Some say spoofing shouldn't be illegal at all.

"If that's what Sarao did, he should be punished accordingly for breaking the rules," said Tradeworx founder Narang. "However, an entirely different question is whether this activity should be outlawed. I believe it should not be."

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/flash-crash-charges-garner-increasing-225311368.html

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/uk-trader-accused-flash-crash-112925612.html
 

Similar threads