How many of are aware of "Aricle 49 O"? I wasn't!

rkkarnani

Well-Known Member
#1
Not many are aware that :

Article 49-O of our Constitution gives us the Right to not vote.






Elections are being held in many states , a few states it is over. All political parties have started and initiated the campaign. But are we aware of a power that lies with the citizens to reject a candidate in an election.....
Yes freinds we have the collective power to reject all candidates standing from our constituency and make them un elligible to stand again in election from the same constituency!!!!

DID YOU know that there is a provision in the Constitution of India, as per the Conduct of Elections Rules, 1969 Act, in Section 49-O that a person can go to the polling booth, confirm his identity, get his finger marked, and convey to the presiding election officer that he/she doesnt want to vote for anyone!

Yes, such a feature is available, but obviously these seemingly notorious leaders have never disclosed it.

It is called "49-O".

49-O: The voter (or elector) deciding not to vote:

If an elector, after his electoral roll number has been duly entered in the register of voters in Form-17A and has put his signature or thumb impression thereon as required under sub-rule (1) of rule 49L, decided not to record his vote, a remark to this effect shall be made against the said entry in Form 17A by the presiding officer and the signature or thumb impression of the elector shall be obtained against such remark.

If you think none of the candidates at the ward / constituency are able enough to lead the community, you can always opt not to vote, but if you will use this right of yours you may start a new things in our electoral process, which will further strengthen our democracy.

It is useful in the following way:

In a ward or constituency, if a candidate wins, say by x votes, and that particular ward has received "49-O" votes more than x, then that polling will be cancelled and will have to be re-polled.

Not only that, but the candidature of the contestants will be removed and they cannot contest the re-polling, since people have already expressed their decision on them. This would bring fear into parties and hence look for genuine candidates for their parties for election. This would change the way of our whole political system. It is seemingly surprising why the election commission has not revealed such a feature to the public.

We need to spread the word about this and make our fellow countrymen aware of this right. No political party (or conventional media) would campaign for it. Its yours and my duty. So, lets go ahead from today!

Also needed is a "reform" in recording the denial of vote... the procedure needs to be changed.

My suggestion :
The process of recording the desire of an elector none to vote should be further simplified. It should be made secret as is our choice for a particular candidate.
In case of Electronic machines there should be a button to press to record a denial as per Art. 49 O. And where the ballot paper is to be stamped,let there be an universal symbol indicating the desire Not to vote for any and the same be marked by the voter as his choice.

No one needs to know before the counting how many have opted for this choice.
 

hitesh

Active Member
#2
Not many are aware that :

Article 49-O of our Constitution gives us the Right to not vote.






Elections are being held in many states , a few states it is over. All political parties have started and initiated the campaign. But are we aware of a power that lies with the citizens to reject a candidate in an election.....
Yes freinds we have the collective power to reject all candidates standing from our constituency and make them un elligible to stand again in election from the same constituency!!!!

DID YOU know that there is a provision in the Constitution of India, as per the Conduct of Elections Rules, 1969 Act, in Section 49-O that a person can go to the polling booth, confirm his identity, get his finger marked, and convey to the presiding election officer that he/she doesn’t want to vote for anyone!

Yes, such a feature is available, but obviously these seemingly notorious leaders have never disclosed it.

It is called "49-O".

49-O: The voter (or elector) deciding not to vote:

If an elector, after his electoral roll number has been duly entered in the register of voters in Form-17A and has put his signature or thumb impression thereon as required under sub-rule (1) of rule 49L, decided not to record his vote, a remark to this effect shall be made against the said entry in Form 17A by the presiding officer and the signature or thumb impression of the elector shall be obtained against such remark.

If you think none of the candidates at the ward / constituency are able enough to lead the community, you can always opt not to vote, but if you will use this right of yours you may start a new things in our electoral process, which will further strengthen our democracy.

It is useful in the following way:

In a ward or constituency, if a candidate wins, say by ’x’ votes, and that particular ward has received "49-O" votes more than x, then that polling will be cancelled and will have to be re-polled.

Not only that, but the candidature of the contestants will be removed and they cannot contest the re-polling, since people have already expressed their decision on them. This would bring fear into parties and hence look for genuine candidates for their parties for election. This would change the way of our whole political system. It is seemingly surprising why the election commission has not revealed such a feature to the public.

We need to spread the word about this and make our fellow countrymen aware of this right. No political party (or conventional media) would campaign for it. It’s yours and my duty. So, let’s go ahead from today!

Also needed is a "reform" in recording the denial of vote... the procedure needs to be changed.

My suggestion :
The process of recording the desire of an elector “none to vote” should be further simplified. It should be made ’secret’ as is our choice for a particular candidate.
In case of Electronic machines there should be a button to press to record a ‘denial’ as per Art. 49 O. And where the ballot paper is to be stamped,let there be an universal symbol indicating the desire Not to vote for any and the same be marked by the voter as his choice.

No one needs to know before the counting how many have opted for this choice.
Yes, Mr. rkkarnani, Article 49-O gives you right not to vote.

As you have righly pointed out, V should be given right of rejection. As for example, in one constituency, there are two candidates contesting election. Voting should be conducted as follows:-

1. Mr A of party X
2. Mr B of party Y
3. None of the above.

If, in any constituency, none of the above received majority, Mr. A and Mr B should not be allowed to contest election / hold public post for atleast 15 years.

I have tried to outline reforms required in our political system at the following link.

http://blogs.livemint.com/blogs/if_...reform-the-entire-system-hitesh-j-pandya.aspx

Thanks & Regards
Hitesh
 
Last edited:

hitesh

Active Member
#3
I have another idea related to trading :

All traders who lose money and are thus unsuccessful should be banned from trading and having demat and trading accounts for 15 years.

They are losers and gamblers who could not garner sufficient profits, and the markets taught them a lesson, they will eventually lose their wealth and cause undue hardships to their families - they should be banned for 15 years.


Even better idea ... since the masses have put corrupt politicians in power, these masses are stupid to make any decisions. Therefore, disbar these masses from voting for 15 years !!

Or perhaps ... a company is interviewing candidates for a position. It does not find a suitable candidate. So all the candidates who applied should not apply again for similar posts for the next 15 years.

I invite such similar ideas that can implemented across various spectrums :)

LOL ... the list goes on.
Yes Adheer

Then let this country be continue tolerating inefficient politicians who have no moral responsibilities and continuously engaged in blame game. Then let us not complain good people are not coming into politics.

Ultimately we have democracy and we will get what we deserve.

You cannot compare trading / gambling with people in public life.

In trading, you are loosing your own money. Here you are dealing with public administration. Let politician be inefficient / imperfect in his personal dealing, we have no problem whatsoever. But when its public, only national interest can be of utmost important.

And what 15 years? In private organization, if a person doesnt perform his job properly, he is sacked by the employer permanently.
 

Prabhjeet

Well-Known Member
#4
Where can I find these "good" people you claim ? It is a myth and delusion.
Only 40% of the educated middle-class votes. They are lazy and want to blame the politicians. .
Very well said Adheer, we should all give you a standing ovation :rolleyes:

Its easy to say that educated people are lazy, but tell me, if I am employed at some company what should I do, let my family starve and give all my money and time to try and improve the social condition. Yes I can do whatever constructive I can do for my society once my job is finished but not before I complete all my moral duties towards my family.

You may be well aware that politicians are getting paid from what we earn through our Hard work and doing all the Social Welfare work is not their duty but their JOB instead, can you make the difference between JOB & DUTY.

Tell me when I go to vote I see one candidate who was the Mayor for last 3 years and the other one who was the Administrator for 3 yrs. before this person and as usual both have not done any good to my City, country, etc. then whom should I vote for. I would better sit at my home then.

And let me clear your illusion about why poor eneducated people vote more than educated middle class, its because they are paid for it, yes these shrewd politicians send Tonnes of food and other ammunities to these people so that they come to vote. Their votes have hardly got anything to do with selecting best man for the job.

Next time when you see large crowds shouting NETAJI ZINDABAD, you should know that these are poor people who have been filled to brim with Liquor & Chicken, they can do anything for these 2 items.

And you say Educated people are lazy :cool:
 

Prabhjeet

Well-Known Member
#5
You are making too many assumptions. Who asked you to give all your money or all your time ?
Money does not solve problems - volunteering time and resources is much more effective. You have to do what you think best suits you.
Is it me who is making assumptions?? Stop trying to live in your imaginary world of Idealism and get back to the world of Realism. Anybody having the knowledge about our Political system knows how much it takes to bag a Ticket for electing as a MLA, MP, etc. I know the exact amount which some of people had paid.

I dont want to waste that much of money for getting a job that I dont want to do. I am not like those people who spend money on elections thinking that they will make 10 times more during their tenure



You answered your own question. Of course, sit at home and keep complaining :)
Not complaining at all, I have my own ways to fight against corruption. We have a group of 50 people who are always there to help people whose rights have not been granted to them. We take to cleaning streets ourselves every month, have a youth organisation and much more


Of course, they are lazy. If they sit at home and keep complaining that there is a problem in the system - they are lazy and in denial.
Because, the crowd is bigger these lazy guys will sit at home and complain that they cannot do anything.
Its not the laziness, but the system which does makes people decide against voting. If I see 2 candidates A & B both not worth my votes what should I do, vote C whose name is not even in the list???

So, how is this different if those brave policemen who could have decided not to fight the terrorists because the terrorists had advanced weapons and grenades ? Oh I see .. they were PAID to do their DUTY. But lazy educated middle-class can sit at home and complain - there is no CIVIC DUTY expected from them.
I feel as much pride for Brave Policemen as you do but can you compare these Brave men to our NETAS.??

Havent you heard the remarks of RR Patil desribing Mumbai Attack as a "Small Incidents" that usually take place in "Big Cities", is it that small an incident :eek:

Or How about Kerala CM saying to Father of a Commando who was Slain in Mumbai attack that Not even a DOG would have come to your house had your son not being killed in Terrorist attack.


No my friend, dont compare Khakhi and Khaddi

By the way, what is your opinion on educated people engaging in piracy ? You left that part out ... perhaps conveniently ? :D
I would very well have given my opinion about Piracy if I was into that business..:)
 
Last edited: