Conservative strategy

DSM

Well-Known Member
Suri,

Here's my thinking.... Supertrend is good for catching trends. The market or the biggies are good for triggering SL. So how if the same idea is used for entry? Bullish Supertrend signal -20 points or -10 points (limit entry) with a SL of further 10 points. Super trend will align us with the trend... but our entry is cautious, and SL level close to give a good RR ratio. Some trades may be missed (we cannot have it all) I guess 60-70% of the days the entry can be taken, as the market does trends only 20-30% of the time... The SL is conservative, and should make money for a disciplined trader.... Just my view...

Edit : I guess most indicator based or pivot based strategies can be tweaked for a better return.

Never mind. Probably anything mechanical is not going to work here. Its only my attempt to devise if any such thing exits. As far as I know nobody has put their real money into this.

Because of rigidity of rules, there were massive moves missed. There is no specific rule to be in such trades. No trailing stop is talked about.

In my experience anything less than 20 points SL it is very hard to trade in Nifty. I mean initial stop should be atleast 20 points.

If you see nifty chart on any day, there will be hardly some days where every bull candle is not followed by a red candle vis a vis. It implies that direct exits work better than trailing stops. Trailing the stop comes with experience ie our initial SL should hit only in cannot but situations. Exiting the trade is more of an art than science. Risk reward is to be monitored dynamically.

Keep a SL of 20 points and profit taking target of 5 points....you will have a dramatic hit ratio. I feel that is how this is to be played though looks silly. You should always guard the trade against hitting deep SL. You should find a way to close the trade somewhere in the middle and most of the time tiny profit side.

Here, one can refer DSM guidelines which he posted somewhere in this thread itself.
 

marimuthu13

Well-Known Member
Suri,

Here's my thinking.... Supertrend is good for catching trends. The market or the biggies are good for triggering SL. So how if the same idea is used for entry? Bullish Supertrend signal -20 points or -10 points (limit entry) with a SL of further 10 points. Super trend will align us with the trend... but our entry is cautious, and SL level close to give a good RR ratio. Some trades may be missed (we cannot have it all) I guess 60-70% of the days the entry can be taken, as the market does trends only 20-30% of the time... The SL is conservative, and should make money for a disciplined trader.... Just my view...
Superb idea..i tried it too, not with ST but with other trend system ..It will just increase RR very much...1:1.5 now..it may increase to 1:4 too...
 

suri112000

Well-Known Member
Suri,

Here's my thinking.... Supertrend is good for catching trends. The market or the biggies are good for triggering SL. So how if the same idea is used for entry? Bullish Supertrend signal -20 points or -10 points (limit entry) with a SL of further 10 points. Super trend will align us with the trend... but our entry is cautious, and SL level close to give a good RR ratio. Some trades may be missed (we cannot have it all) I guess 60-70% of the days the entry can be taken, as the market does trends only 20-30% of the time... The SL is conservative, and should make money for a disciplined trader.... Just my view...

Edit : I guess most indicator based or pivot based strategies can be tweaked for a better return.
The strategy of this thread is showing negative results.

I have worked out your idea with following parameters.
1. Data of Aug series
2. Took 1 lot on first entry. If after 1st lot entry hits 20 points profit, i booked it.
3. If after 1st entry, market reverses then i take 2nd entry at -20 points from initial entry keeping SL -10 points from seond entry for both lots.
In case this trade does not work, we are going to loose total 40 points plus brokerage.
4. If market moves favourably, i book at average 20 points profits on both lots. In case this trade works, we gain 40 points.
5. if after adding 2nd lot, the signal flips, i simply wait for SL hit.
6. if market already moved significantly when SL hits, since the fresh entry is already late, no fresh entry is taken.
7. supertrend has a tendency to continue the trend to next day as well.
So, i initiated first entry on completion of 5 min bar as per existing trend.

Total =130 points made (deduct brokerage, taxes)
 

humble

Well-Known Member
yes. you are right.

@ humble,

please make the SL 10 points profit targets as 15, 20, 25, 30.
Further, each day starts with 2 lots, then 3 lots, then 4 lots if 1st and 2nd trades hit stop loss.
if 1st and 2nd trades hit profit target, then 2nd and 3rd trades are with 2 lots each.
increment in lots is only when previous trade hit SL.
while incrementing if any trade hit profit target, bring the lot size of next trade to 2 again.

In total 4 simulations. if it is not burden to you only.:)
Maybe one more with no profit target, let it run till closing time for MIS positions (3:15 PM or there about). :)

@ Suri

He already had done this kind of testing but with different permutations using the previous sizing scheme, with this new sizing model the results should improve.

My feel is that letting the profitable position run till end should also introduce a significant improvement in performance.

Happy :)

Suri, for Target: 15, 20, 25 it gave -ve results. It turned positive for 30. I can post/upload the trades if you wish to have a look at them.

Happy, inaddition to the earlier rules, I introduced EMA(100) for "Entry" condition and a filter of 8 points i.e (latest -ve candles high + 8) for longs and opposite for shorts. And there is no target specified. I have not yet verified the trades, so again results to be taken with a pinch of salt. In my tests I have seen that filter does play an important role and the results don't change much when it is > 8. EMA helps in reducing the number of trades.

Total Points: 28750 SL: 15 points. Changing it to 10 has only marginal impact. Changing to max 3 lots from 2 lot also increases the profitability but only marginally.
Number of Trades: 1941
Number of Months: 68
Monthly average Points: 422
Monthly average number of trades: 28
Monthly average number of times stop hit: 13
Number of Losing months: 1
Number of Winning months: 67
Longest Losing streak: 9 ending on: 2011-08-04 12:14:59
Losing streak Drawdown: -181.1
Longest Winning streak: 8 ending on: 2011-07-27 09:49:59

Trades are available for verification here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eou_Ost1rBmvZm38uSXN5AES70xoM7oFnAZ_6G2k2oc/edit?usp=sharing

Following is the equity curve with points on Y-axis and trades on X-axis:


Suri, do let know if you want me to post these in a different thread, I prefer not to clutter your thread with tangential ideas.

Another generic question, why you experienced people prefer NF over BNF?
 
Last edited:
Happy, inaddition to the earlier rules, I introduced EMA(100) for "Entry" condition and a filter of 8 points i.e (latest -ve candles high + 8) for longs and opposite for shorts. And there is no target specified. I have not yet verified the trades, so again results to be taken with a pinch of salt. In my tests I have seen that filter does play an important role and the results don't change much when it is > 8. EMA helps in reducing the number of trades.

Total Points: 28750 SL: 15 points. Changing it to 10 has only marginal impact. Changing to max 3 lots from 2 lot also increases the profitability but only marginally.
Number of Trades: 1941
Number of Months: 68
Monthly average Points: 422
Monthly average number of trades: 28
Monthly average number of times stop hit: 13
Number of Losing months: 1
Number of Winning months: 67
Longest Losing streak: 9 ending on: 2011-08-04 12:14:59
Losing streak Drawdown: -181.1
Longest Winning streak: 8 ending on: 2011-07-27 09:49:59

Trades are available for verification here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eou_Ost1rBmvZm38uSXN5AES70xoM7oFnAZ_6G2k2oc/edit?usp=sharing
Excellent work :clapping:

With whatever back testing work I have done, this is a generic conclusion as we introduce a profit stop in a mechanical system
the over all profit potential of the system will reduce. Profit stops maybe very much needed for psychological reasons.
Trad-ability of a system is most important, just having better numbers on paper won't do.

Another generic question, why you experienced people prefer NF over BNF?
We all trade BNF, but with BNF slippage is always there, and with weekly options the spikes have just increased,
but it has great volatility so a good trading instrument, i personally prefer to swing trade BNF.

With NF, what you test is what you get
We get easy fills so very low on slippage, can scale up to any number
also options on NF are very liquid, even wings

Happy :)
 
Last edited:

vijayanscbe

Well-Known Member
Thanks for your link , but their method is slightly different from the method which used in this thread. Okay I just asked whether here (this thread) any body knows the calculation behind the Indicator. Because understanding the system better gives edge in trading, than calculating the profit/loss with different SL ,TGT points and martingale multipliers. Optimizing the points to maximize the profit with past datas is called Curve Fitting. The market dynamics wont remain constant to value our optimized points.

So my point is maximize the output by understanding the method better.


.
 

XRAY27

Well-Known Member
Thanks for your link , but their method is slightly different from the method which used in this thread. Okay I just asked whether here (this thread) any body knows the calculation behind the Indicator. Because understanding the system better gives edge in trading, than calculating the profit/loss with different SL ,TGT points and martingale multipliers. Optimizing the points to maximize the profit with past datas is called Curve Fitting. The market dynamics wont remain constant to value our optimized points.

So my point is maximize the output by understanding the method better.


.
You asked about indicator calculation and it is same, only thing is multiplier it depends on the customer and his needs and thread is in search of system from this indicator !!! this is what i understood from the posts of this thread starter