..........intrinsic Value Of A Stock.........

jatayoo

jatayoo

Well-Known Member
#11
#11
alpha1 said:
So this is a simple method of valuation.

Nice.
Click to expand...
Dear Alpha
It is not simple. Do have a look at prof damodran's writings after google search on the internet.
It is a bit like cooking.The essential fundamentals have to be rigorously adhered to eg SEVEN TO TEN YEARS % groweth EPS, Sales, ROCE, ROE, TWO TO THREE YEAR TRAILING eps BANDS,RATE OF INFLATION,EXPECTED RETURN(something realistic),co relation between groweth rate and PE band.
***** YOU HAVE THE FREEDOM TO MIX AND MATCH..... More of chilli, less of salt,garlic sauce or tomato sauce?
**** Here experience and wisdom of the financial markets matters and is the deciding factor.:D
 
jatayoo

jatayoo

Well-Known Member
#12
#12
alpha1 said:
So this is a simple method of valuation.

Nice.
Click to expand...
Dear Alpha
It is not simple. Do have a look at prof damodran's writings after google search on the internet.
It is a bit like cooking.The essential fundamentals have to be rigorously adhered to eg SEVEN TO TEN YEARS % groweth EPS, Sales, ROCE, ROE, TWO TO THREE YEAR TRAILING eps BANDS,RATE OF INFLATION,EXPECTED RETURN(something realistic),co relation between groweth rate and PE band.
***** YOU HAVE THE FREEDOM TO MIX AND MATCH..... More of chilli, less of salt,garlic sauce or tomato sauce?
**** Here experience and wisdom of the financial markets matters and is the deciding factor.:D:rolleyes:
 
O

oxusmorouz

Well-Known Member
#13
#13
jatayoo said:
*Keynes theory of Demand Supply applies today, and probably for all times to come.One has to accept this.
Click to expand...
Correction. Keynes' theory of demand side economics is challenged, criticized, and proven to work only under a "particular" type of market, similar to our "expert's" FA (Which works with little flaw in a bull market). The demand run post war economic expansion of the US was stalled by something which had little to do with demand. With the crude oil price rise of the 70's due to OPEC's oligarchy was something new to the demand side economists who still continued to effect inflation by creating policies which affect demand, later proven ineffective. With modern schools of economics such as rational expectations thought, neoclassical theories, and monetary economics taking a firm ground, Keynes' concepts provide little value in the current juncture.

jatayoo said:
**** THE PEOPLE WHO HELD THE ONIONS AT THE HIGHER PRICES IN COLD STORES HIT A LOSS.THEY ARE THE RETAIL INVESTORS WHO DID NOT HAVE THE INFORMATION THAT THE BIG GUYS HAD
Click to expand...
Noise trading, noise trading by proxy. Hazardous to wealth undoubtedly.

jatayoo said:
HENCE THE BEST DEFENSE FOR THE OUTSIDER I.E THE RETAIL investors , IS TO HAVE A CLEAR CONCEPT OF INTRINSIC VALUE.
If the outsider does not have this clear he will be always guessing..... and playing between supports and resistances that the INSIDERS have created in the past.
Click to expand...
Considering the few trillion variables which affect prices, what was intrinsic value when the expectations were formed differs from the intrinsic value when the govt announced the supply arrangements. Giving 1 static intrinsic value to a stock merely based on expected earning and expected growth of 1 year doesn't look to be very rational. As famous quote goes, "In the long run, stocks tend to stick onto their intrinsic values" (Hypothesis of fundamental analysts) ..."In the long run, we'll all be dead" (A quote by beloved Maynard Keynes).

Your hypothesis: Stocks tend to stick onto intrinsic values sooner or later. Stocks below their intrinsic values tend to out perform the stocks quoting above the intrinsic value.

For this to hold true, sufficient data to quantify earnings expectations, expected growth, and historical prices of equities should be quantified and tested on the data and the result should agree with your hypothesis.
Till then, it remains a myth, a tale not backable by evidence.
 
jatayoo

jatayoo

Well-Known Member
#14
#14
oxusmorouz said:
Correction. Keynes' theory of demand side economics is challenged, criticized, and proven to work only under a "particular" type of market, similar to our "expert's" FA (Which works with little flaw in a bull market). The demand run post war economic expansion of the US was stalled by something which had little to do with demand. With the crude oil price rise of the 70's due to OPEC's oligarchy was something new to the demand side economists who still continued to effect inflation by creating policies which affect demand, later proven ineffective. With modern schools of economics such as rational expectations thought, neoclassical theories, and monetary economics taking a firm ground, Keynes' concepts provide little value in the current juncture.


Noise trading, noise trading by proxy. Hazardous to wealth undoubtedly.


Considering the few trillion variables which affect prices, what was intrinsic value when the expectations were formed differs from the intrinsic value when the govt announced the supply arrangements. Giving 1 static intrinsic value to a stock merely based on expected earning and expected growth of 1 year doesn't look to be very rational. As famous quote goes, "In the long run, stocks tend to stick onto their intrinsic values" (Hypothesis of fundamental analysts) ..."In the long run, we'll all be dead" (A quote by beloved Maynard Keynes).

Your hypothesis: Stocks tend to stick onto intrinsic values sooner or later. Stocks below their intrinsic values tend to out perform the stocks quoting above the intrinsic value.

For this to hold true, sufficient data to quantify earnings expectations, expected growth, and historical prices of equities should be quantified and tested on the data and the result should agree with your hypothesis.
Till then, it remains a myth, a tale not backable by evidence.
Click to expand...
________________________________________________________
HI
I understand the logic of your arguments.Some say that the Markets are perfectly logical and discount all available information.
**The second school of thaught postiluates that the Markets are irrational and tend to the INTRINSIC VALUE now and then.This implies that the Markets are generally overoptimistic or over pesimistic and swing to the INTRINSIC VALUE eventually.
***I remember many people who in 1994/1995 were of the firm view that their is a big bubble and the Markets are going to crash any day to 3000 levels.For then 3000 was the level forever.Then they were afraid at 10,00 12,00 13,000, 14,000 and now 15,000 levels today.They were all Retail Investors.Some of them i do not find on any board at all today.WHY?
****The theory is simple i.e it is the insiders who set the market levels as they have the best of research and industry dynamics.They stop and consolidate when they are not sure.They accumulate slowely when they become bullish .They release the news after acumulation is over so that the retail can jump in.They help in bidding up the price.The biggest insider is the promoter and his cronies.I can give you many examples of this manipulation.
*****So do i stand a chance against them -- guessing their moves all the time.
******Exceptional situations aside, which are rare, Keynes theory holds the test of time.
*******Hence to have an indipendent view that you can stick by thick and thin you need to know the INTRINSIC VALUE at different periods of time.If the Inerest rates change or Inflation goes up i have to adjust my value.It takes a second on excell.
******** I am a beleiver of the fact that the market swings from one extreme to another.If someone beleives differently i agree with his right to differ.
:D:D:D
 
C

CreditViolet

Guest
#15
#15
jatayoo said:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I do not think that we will ever get a mathematically perfect method for the capital markets ever.If their was one it would have been found out by now
Click to expand...
Maybe there is and maybe its found out already.Only problem would be that those who did it wont write a book about it. :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Harris_Simons
 
C

CreditViolet

Guest
#16
#16
jatayoo said:
________________________________________________________

****The theory is simple i.e it is the insiders who set the market levels as they have the best of research and industry dynamics.They stop and consolidate when they are not sure.They accumulate slowely when they become bullish .They release the news after acumulation is over so that the retail can jump in.They help in bidding up the price.The biggest insider is the promoter and his cronies.I can give you many examples of this manipulation.
*****So do i stand a chance against them -- guessing their moves all the time.
Click to expand...
But the thing is, all this isnt done secretly, it happens on the exchanges, in whole public view and there is no reason at all to guess anything.Anyone with an eye for the unusual could spot how these so called operator activity stick out like a sore thumb.
 
A

alpha1

Member
#18
#18
DUDE
It would be better if you could use a little bit more of punctuations and seperation of text in paragraphs.

And not use more than two colors.


AND DEFINITLY NO UNDERLINING IN TYPED TEXT.
 
A

alpha1

Member
#19
#19
I would've really liked to go throuh\gh all your post material.

But serioulsy I could only continue till 2-3 lines.
After that my mind refused to understand any signal that my eyes were trying to send.
 
jatayoo

jatayoo

Well-Known Member
#20
#20
uasish said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_value :confused:

I have heard in CNBC ,now a days they use this Metrics ,however FA is never my cup of tea.
Click to expand...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HI
I have gone through this concept and have used it for the last 12years.It ia a relative metric to evaluate a stock against it's peers or the sector.It tells you the relative expensiveness of two stocks in the same sector.
*********:D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Vmaster369 Benjamin-Graham’s Formula for Intrinsic Value Beginners Guide 3
E How to calculate the intrinsic value of a Stock? Fundamental Analysis 3
M Intrinsic value of the stocks Fundamental Analysis 44
M intrinsic value Fundamental Analysis 13
R How to find intrinsic value stock holding companies? Fundamental Analysis 0

Similar threads