![]() |
|
| Discuss Finmin's listing proposal will depress markets: Experts at the Current Affairs within the Traderji.com - Discussion forum for Stocks Commodities & Forex; Hello Guys, Wondering what might be the impact of the below news in ST. Please ... |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Current Affairs Discuss the latest happenings in the world of trading and investing here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hello Guys,
Wondering what might be the impact of the below news in ST. Please post your comments. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW DELHI: Finance Ministry's proposal to impose a mandatory limit of public holding in listed companies has evoked a sharp reaction from experts, who feel that such a move would depress capital markets. "The finance ministry's proposal will further depress the markets and not benefit retail investors," said investment analyst and resource person of Consumer Unity and Trust Society (CUTS) Jaisingh Kothari. Expressing a similar opinion, senior partner of Titus and Co Advocates, Diljeet Titus said "the proposal would affect more than 40 per cent of the companies who will be required to comply with a new set of regulations." Managing director of Taurus Mutual Fund, R K Gupta, also felt that "it would be be difficult for the companies to comply with the regulations as they cannot control sale-purchase of equity on the market." The Finance Ministry has issued a discussion paper proposing a mandatory limit of 25 per cent of public holding in all listed companies. The discussion paper also made a case of properly defining the word 'public' in the Securities Contracts Regulations Act, possibly by excluding institutional investors like FIIs, financial institutions and mutual funds. Commenting on the proposal to define the word 'public', Titus said, "definition can never be all encompassing as there would be exceptions. It would lead to litigation, ultimately affecting the business of companies." The Finance Ministry's proposal, Titus said, would also create different categories of investors "virtually forcing a retail investor to find out another retail investor to sell shares." If pursued, he added, the proposal could even shrink the market and depress the value of shares. The better way to deal with stock market volatility, Titus said, would be to improve compliance of the existing regulations. According to Kothari, "this is not the right time to impose such a regulation as the proposal would not benefit retail investors." The government should ban short-selling before imposing such a restrictive regulation, he said, adding that "in a free market, the companies should be given the freedom to fix prices and decide on percentage of shares to be offloaded to public." Even if the companies decided to offload shares at this time, Kothari said, "it would not be possible for retail investors, who have already exhausted their limits, to buy shares at current rates." Many promoters, Gupta said, want to keep their shareholding up to 55 per cent to ward off threats of hostile takeover, but they have no control over the remaining portion. Secondly, he added, the companies would face practical difficulties in ensuring that 25 per cent of equity remains with a particular set of investors. Referring to some high-premium IOPs in the recent past, Gupta said, "the government should develop some mechanism to ensure that companies do not charge premiums beyond a point." Source: http://economictimes.***************...ow/2752579.cms Last edited by debdeeps; 3rd February 2008 at 03:49 PM. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Indemnity, Disclaimer & Disclosure
Notice:
• By visiting Traderji.com you indicate your acceptance of our Forum
Rules Disclaimer & Disclosure and indemnify Traderji.com, its
associates and related parties of all claims howsoever resulting from
the usage of the forum.
• Disclaimer: Trading or investing in stocks & commodities
is a high risk activity. Any action you choose to take in the markets
is totally your own responsibility. Traderji.com will not be liable for
any, direct or indirect, consequential or incidental damages or loss arising out of the use of this information.
• Disclosure: The information in this forum is neither an offer to sell nor solicitation to buy any of the securities mentioned herein.
The writers may or may not be trading in the securities mentioned.
• All names or products mentioned are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.
General Content Disclaimer Notice:
In light of our policy of encouraging candid, open exchanges of views and the rapid distribution of information originating from many sources, Traderji.com cannot determine the accuracy of information that may be uploaded to the forum. Opinions, advice and all other information expressed by participants in discussions are those of the author. You rely on such information at your own risk. You are urged to seek professional advice for specific, individual situations and not rely solely on advice or opinions given in the discussions. Since Traderji.com is an open and free discussion forum, any comments made by members of this forum in their posts reflect their own views and not of the owner or administrator of Traderji.com. Thus the owner/administrator indemnify themselves of all claims whatsoever and will not be liable or responsible for any members comments/views in this forum Traderji.com. If you find any objectionable or offensive posts made by members of this forum which you would like to bring to our notice for removal then please Contact Us.