Thanks TT for sharing your views. Even if you have different views from mine, it is fine. We don't have to think alike always. Just would like to share my views on your reply.
AW10
I would like to differ a little on the subject. I feel this distinction of novice trading against the professional should be confined to the books. It has very little practical use while trading live. Most small traders are looking for say 40 points on the Nifty in a day. Else they are looking for 2-3% on a intraday trade. It is almost immaterial whom they are trading against. It is also difficult to find out in a live trade what professional money is doing.
I don't think so TT that it is difficult to find out professionals foot print on chart. If we adopt some points from VSA analysis, Market profile approach, etc then we might be able to see the background picture of the bar. It is infact lot easy to see in orderflow.. for eg - on a support, we see 10000 nifty qty on buy side in 1 order.. and 11050 qty in 35 buy orders ? Not just once, but repeatedly as price jumps around support level or makes double bottom.. or even crosses the pivot low there. Is it so difficult to figure out which set of buy order is from novice and which is from Pros. If we observe it closely, then we get develop our 6th sense of whether a particular level will hold or break.
I think, to understand this domain, we need to go beyond the obvious of chart / candlestick/ TA/ indicators and develop different approach by combining multiple factors.
Another assumption that I would question is that professional money always makes profits. There are so many instances of professional money going bust. When we buy say 10 lots of Nifty in a day is it important to know if we are buying from a professional or a novice? Can you ever make that out? What if the professional money comes in after you have entered the trade? How do you make it out?
I agree with you here. There are dumb money in big money /professional money as well. I think, more appropriate term will be Consistently Profitably Trader v/s Consistently Loosing Trader (CPT v/s CLT .. i think i shd patent these new names)
Certainly, it is not easy to find out in black and white about who was on the other side. But lets say, if someone is consistently buying at resistance zone, can he be profitable in long run. If he uses Stoploss and has good strategy then maybe yes.. As majority of CLT's trading decision is based on emotions.. hence it is higher chance that they are buying here after seeing the rise of price. Maybe by this time, all lagging indicators are also giving entry signals. Hence it is higher probability to meet CLT buyer in resistance zone. and vice versa for CLT Seller in support zone.
Most of the time, CLT are first one to jump at the breakout/breakdown from a level.. cause that's the tip provider / media tells - nifty buy signal above 3354 / sell below 5278. A CPT, who understand risk mgmt, who searches for low risk entry, demonstrates patience will not jump at first breakout..but will wait for price to retest this price level. And when they see old resistance become support, they jump in.
i.e they are buying at support.. when it has become support.. rather then jumping at resistance predicting that it is going to become support now.
This is how I try to interpret the chart action.. and read something about my opponent.
Only at EOD when the NSE publishes the figures we know that professional money has done for the day. Again it is wrong to think that all professional money acts in concert. The EOD figures only tell us the net position. Again there is something like 2000cr buying and 2500 cr selling in a day with the net being 500cr of selling. The professional money at least some of it has bought while some professional money has sold. When you entered the trade if could have been the professional money buying or selling, there is no way to know.
To me, in isolation, this FII/DII is one of most useless data in the current form as hyped by media. To make any sense out of it, we have to assimilate and crunch it little more before using it in our trading. eg. if we don't know what is the usual trading volume of FII.. then 500 Cr selling is of no use. But If we know that their net number is 50Cr to 100 cr. generally but it has jumped to 500 Cr today then it gives meaningful info. Else it is just another random number. This info may still be useful for swing/position trading..but not for day-trading, IMO.
IMO it is more important to have a system and trade the system. If the system is robust it will win against the novice as well as the professional. In trading the markets the adversary is not outside. He is inside us.
Absolutely correct. Agree with you here. I would add, the system that is made to trade against CLT's action, has higher reliability of success and longer life.. Cause 90% people in the market belong to this camp. Otherwise, system that is working today may not work in different market condition. And market conditions do change. This one of the selection criteria that I use in picking up a system to trade.
There are 100s of system out there that are profitable.. but are they worth spending my time, if they are going to fail in high volatility of May and Oct month..or of 2008.
Just sharing some of my thoughts. Hope it makes you think and look at trading from different perspective.
Happy trading