Is it possible this formula?

#1
I test more formula .When tested All these formulas I see a % winnig between 55% and 35% .We can increase this ratio using statistics

Example 1 ;

if winning 2 (x) trade , then wait for 1(y) trade

example 2 ;

if winning %5 (x) trade , then Wait until a trade that lost 1%(y)


x and y values can be optimized ?

Is there a formula for this example?
Which function should I do with it?
 
#2
190 people looked at, but no one answers.I'm trying to understand why.

*My English is not very good.Did not understand this reason?
*Question too silly and pointless useless?
*Such a thing is not possible ?
*Does anyone knows the answer ?


I did experiment with the very formula but I did not like None of the formula.I want a different approach.I wrote it so

Thanks
 

umeshmandal

Well-Known Member
#3
190 people looked at, but no one answers.I'm trying to understand why.

*My English is not very good.Did not understand this reason?
*Question too silly and pointless useless?
*Such a thing is not possible ?
*Does anyone knows the answer ?


I did experiment with the very formula but I did not like None of the formula.I want a different approach.I wrote it so

Thanks
I might be the 191st person to look at it. Dont know about others but I with my limited IQ could make out what exactly you are trying to say and ask? May be you rewrite the thing a bit more elaborately!
 

stock72

Well-Known Member
#4
and me 192 ..

having same issue ..

rewrite please ..
put some example etc to understand the question ...

I might be the 191st person to look at it. Dont know about others but I with my limited IQ could make out what exactly you are trying to say and ask? May be you rewrite the thing a bit more elaborately!
 

onlinegtrash

Well-Known Member
#5
I am just guessing, he is asking AFL to switch between live and paper trades...

If a live trade made 5% profit switch to paper trade and continue until you make your 1% loss trade and then shift the gear back to live. This way paper trades may absorb the losing trades, leaving winning trades for the live trading!

may be I am over complicating things... and 200% off the mark from what @tugiacar intended.
 
Last edited:

stock72

Well-Known Member
#6
If tugiacar is meaning different then you alone can think like this ...:D:D

take it in lighter note ..

I am just guessing, he is asking AFL to switch between live and paper trades...

If a live trade made 5% profit switch to paper trade and continue until you make your 1% loss trade and then shift the gear back to live. This way paper trades may absorb the losing trades, leaving winning trades for the live trading!

may be I am over complicating things... and 200% off the mark from what @tugiacar intended.
 
#7
I'll try to explain once again.Maybe my English is not enough.

I wrote to trades in a month below total score + 2675 point

Rules 1 : if 2000 ( or 2%) and more profitable trades, then wait 1 trade , so we dont trade -1450 and -2225 . Then total score +6350 point ..

Rules 2 :: if 2 consecutive profitable trades,then wait until 1 loss trade

These rules can be written as formula ?

long 99300
short 101075 1775
long 101150 -75
short 101650 500
long 102125 -475
short 102675 550
long 103450 -775
short 106200 2750
long 107650 -1450
short 107250 -400
long 108300 -1050
short 108150 -150
long 108550 -400
short 107850 -700
long 103075 4775
short 100850 -2225
long 99450 1400
short 98200 -1250
long 98325 -125
 

Similar threads